[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 06:49:49 +0200
From: Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] rust: add radix tree abstraction
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
>>
>> Add abstractions for the C radix_tree. This abstraction allows Rust code to use
>> the radix_tree as a map from `u64` keys to `ForeignOwnable` values.
>
> Please, no. The XArray interface is the preferred one; the radix tree
> is legacy. Don't make Rust code use the radix tree. It has the GFP
> arguments in the wrong place, for one thing.
I have a similar argument to not using xarrray as to not using folios,
see my other response. But the Rust xarray API is in the works [1].
Best regards,
Andreas
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/1bb98ef1-727a-45d6-3cf6-39765fe99c5c@asahilina.net/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists