linux-kernel - Re: Introducing bugbot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 May 2023 12:32:26 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     workflows@...r.kernel.org, aros@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
        tools@...ux.kernel.org, linux@...mhuis.info
Subject: Re: Introducing bugbot

On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:12:02 -0400 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 08:52:18AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > Per our discussion last fall, I've been working on a bridge between bugzilla
> > > and public-inbox, which went live in the past few days. It's still a very
> > > early release, but it can do the following:  
> > 
> > What about closing the bugs once they had been fixed/triaged/proven
> > invalid?  
> 
> For now, bugbot can look at a branch in a git repo and close bugs when it sees
> a matching "Closes:" trailer.

Interesting. Obviously that assumes the bug needs a fix, and we're
talking bugzilla so lots of clueless people lobbing non-issues at us.

But also - Closes: is a legit trailer now? I thought we only allow Link:

In any case - I'm guessing I just don't have permissions to close the
issues via web. Is your preference to iterate on the bot or maintainers
to request permissions in BZ (how?)?