[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 13:42:42 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gost.dev@...sung.com,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Rust null block driver
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 05:24:56AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
>
> The Rust bindings are actually the way of communication between
> subsystem mantainers and Rust driver writers, and can help reduce the
> amount of work: You can have the abstraction the way you like.
We don't have stable APIs or structures here, so let's be clear-eyed
about the maintenance burden these bindings create for linux-block
contributors. Not a hard "no" from me, but this isn't something to
handwave over.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists