[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de87f124-b5c1-b7c0-b132-1be615184389@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 10:39:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator
variable
On 24/03/2022 08:32, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
>
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> found boolean [1].
>
> This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
> the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/w1/w1.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Hi,
I am going through old w1 patches and wanted to apply this, but it pops
a checkpatch warning about indentation. Can you fix the warning and send
a new version?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists