[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc3ce44f-745a-bbad-32ac-67f8baa49483@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 15:04:42 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: robh@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steev@...i.org,
quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] PCI: qcom: Do not advertise hotplug capability for IP
v2.3.2
On 06/05/2023 10:31, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> SoCs making use of Qcom PCIe controller IP v2.3.2 do not support hotplug
> functionality. But the hotplug capability bit is set by default in the
> hardware. This causes the kernel PCI core to register hotplug service for
> the controller and send hotplug commands to it. But those commands will
> timeout generating messages as below during boot and suspend/resume.
>
> [ 5.782159] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: pciehp: Timeout on hotplug command 0x03c0 (issued 2020 msec ago)
> [ 5.810161] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: pciehp: Timeout on hotplug command 0x03c0 (issued 2048 msec ago)
> [ 7.838162] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: pciehp: Timeout on hotplug command 0x07c0 (issued 2020 msec ago)
> [ 7.870159] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: pciehp: Timeout on hotplug command 0x07c0 (issued 2052 msec ago)
>
> This not only spams the console output but also induces a delay of a
> couple of seconds. To fix this issue, let's clear the HPC bit in
> PCI_EXP_SLTCAP register as a part of the post init sequence to not
> advertise the hotplug capability for the controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 3d5b3ce9e2da..33353be396ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -579,6 +579,8 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_3_2(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>
> static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_3_2(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> {
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> + u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> u32 val;
>
> /* enable PCIe clocks and resets */
> @@ -602,6 +604,14 @@ static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_3_2(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> val |= EN;
> writel(val, pcie->parf + PARF_AXI_MSTR_WR_ADDR_HALT_V2);
>
> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> +
> + val = readl(pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP);
> + val &= ~PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC;
> + writel(val, pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP);
> +
> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
> +
Seeing this code again and again makes me wonder if we should have a
separate function for this.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists