linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] SH7709 DMA fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e9c027dd90ca9d4a02ba06714960ddcdae5fd2c.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date:   Sat, 06 May 2023 17:25:01 +0200
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc:     Rafael Ignacio Zurita <rafaelignacio.zurita@...il.com>,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SH7709 DMA fixes

Hi Artur!

Thanks a lot for your patches!

On Sat, 2023-05-06 at 16:17 +0200, Artur Rojek wrote:
> this series provides fixes to the SH7709 DMA controller, allowing the HP
> Jornada 680 palmtop to boot Linux again. To my knowledge, this is the
> first time in ~14 years someone tests upstream Linux on this device. And
> with the included patches applied, I'm happy to announce that it still
> works like a charm.

Wow, that sounds great! I will be happy to review your patches.

> PS. What might be of interest to the sh-linux community, there's further
> work towards this platform in my pipeline. E.g. I've added support for
> the HD6446x PCMCIA controller, allowing Jornada 680 to use Ethernet and
> Wi-Fi cards. However, what prevents proper upstream of such a driver is
> the crude and antiquated code of the underlying platform base. For
> example, the HD6446x bridge (`cchips/hd6446x/hd64461.c`) lacks the
> concept of clocks, preventing the PCMCIA driver from hardware agnostic
> clock gating. So what I'm looking into next is the cleanup of existing
> platform code base, bringing it up-to-date with modern kernel APIs.
> Hopefully it's not trying to bite more than I can chew, but eventually
> ending up with Device Tree support would be really nice :)

Yes, there is still a lot of modernization work to be done for SuperH!

Device tree has actually been worked on in the past and there is a patch
set by Yoshinori Sato to add support for device tree that got never merged,
see [1].

Geert and I are planning to have another look at these patches and see whether
we can get them into a shape where they can be merged. Maybe you can help us
with that effort.

I might not have the time for your patches today, but certainly next week
starting Monday. Very much looking forward to reviewing and merging them
into my SuperH tree [2].

Adrian

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1467564402-2649-1-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp/
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glaubitz/sh-linux.git/

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913