lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230506120411.588729735420b57c1e0ce9b5@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 6 May 2023 12:04:11 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dmapool updates for 6.4-rc1

On Sat, 6 May 2023 11:53:16 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 10:50 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Reinstate the dmapool changes which were accidentally removed by
> > 2d55c16c0c54 ("dmapool: create/destroy cleanup").
> 
> Hmm. So this series is exactly the same as def8574308ed..2d55c16c0c54,
> except for not having that last broken one.
> 
> Which is fine, but I'm a bit surprised. Why?
> 
> Because it's also missing the _real_ "dmapool: create/destroy cleanup"
> patch, ie this one:
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230126215125.4069751-13-kbusch@meta.com/
> 
> and I realize you somehow corrupted it last time, but I did expect it
> to show up (perhaps folded into another patch, but in _some_ form).
> 
> Anyway, I've pulled this, but I think the end result of all this
> confusion was still a tad broken.
> 

Yes, it's just a little cleanup so I figured I'd restore the
non-messed-up patches that make functional changes and hold this one
off for the next merge window.


From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Subject: dmapool: create/destroy cleanup
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 13:51:25 -0800

Set the 'empty' bool directly from the result of the function that
determines its value instead of adding additional logic.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230126215125.4069751-13-kbusch@meta.com
Fixes: 2d55c16c0c54 ("dmapool: create/destroy cleanup")
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/dmapool.c |   10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/dmapool.c~dmapool-create-destroy-cleanup
+++ a/mm/dmapool.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const c
 {
 	struct dma_pool *retval;
 	size_t allocation;
-	bool empty = false;
+	bool empty;
 
 	if (!dev)
 		return NULL;
@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const c
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&pools_reg_lock);
 	mutex_lock(&pools_lock);
-	if (list_empty(&dev->dma_pools))
-		empty = true;
+	empty = list_empty(&dev->dma_pools);
 	list_add(&retval->pools, &dev->dma_pools);
 	mutex_unlock(&pools_lock);
 	if (empty) {
@@ -361,7 +360,7 @@ static struct dma_page *pool_alloc_page(
 void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *pool)
 {
 	struct dma_page *page, *tmp;
-	bool empty = false, busy = false;
+	bool empty, busy = false;
 
 	if (unlikely(!pool))
 		return;
@@ -369,8 +368,7 @@ void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *p
 	mutex_lock(&pools_reg_lock);
 	mutex_lock(&pools_lock);
 	list_del(&pool->pools);
-	if (list_empty(&pool->dev->dma_pools))
-		empty = true;
+	empty = list_empty(&pool->dev->dma_pools);
 	mutex_unlock(&pools_lock);
 	if (empty)
 		device_remove_file(pool->dev, &dev_attr_pools);
_

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ