[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nmdkhfvivlwse5jatioclbmx7ggzcbeph37vmlmuiseiixuraf@3s6r27bqrcr2>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 02:16:36 +0530
From: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
"Abhinav Kumar" <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v6 06/15] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper
support
On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 08:16:21PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:35:18PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 5.05.2023 10:46, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 08:34:07AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 3.05.2023 22:32, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 11:40:26AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 2.05.2023 09:49, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 01:54:43PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > >>>>>> Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
> > >>>>>> but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
> > >>>>>> the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care
> > >>>>>> of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Reuse existing Adreno-common code and modify the deeply-GMU-infused
> > >>>>>> A6XX code to facilitate these GPUs. This involves if-ing out lots
> > >>>>>> of GMU callbacks and introducing a new type of GMU - GMU wrapper (it's
> > >>>>>> the actual name that Qualcomm uses in their downstream kernels).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This is essentially a register region which is convenient to model
> > >>>>>> as a device. We'll use it for managing the GDSCs. The register
> > >>>>>> layout matches the actual GMU_CX/GX regions on the "real GMU" devices
> > >>>>>> and lets us reuse quite a bit of gmu_read/write/rmw calls.
> > >>>>> << I sent a reply to this patch earlier, but not sure where it went.
> > >>>>> Still figuring out Mutt... >>
> > >>>> Answered it here:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/4d3000c1-c3f9-0bfd-3eb3-23393f9a8f77@linaro.org/
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks. Will check and respond there if needed.
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I don't think I see any new comments in this "reply revision" (heh), so please
> > >>>> check that one out.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Only convenience I found is that we can reuse gmu register ops in a few
> > >>>>> places (< 10 I think). If we just model this as another gpu memory
> > >>>>> region, I think it will help to keep gmu vs gmu-wrapper/no-gmu
> > >>>>> architecture code with clean separation. Also, it looks like we need to
> > >>>>> keep a dummy gmu platform device in the devicetree with the current
> > >>>>> approach. That doesn't sound right.
> > >>>> That's correct, but.. if we switch away from that, VDD_GX/VDD_CX will
> > >>>> need additional, gmuwrapper-configuration specific code anyway, as
> > >>>> OPP & genpd will no longer make use of the default behavior which
> > >>>> only gets triggered if there's a single power-domains=<> entry, afaicu.
> > >>> Can you please tell me which specific *default behviour* do you mean here?
> > >>> I am curious to know what I am overlooking here. We can always get a cxpd/gxpd device
> > >>> and vote for the gdscs directly from the driver. Anything related to
> > >>> OPP?
> > >> I *believe* this is true:
> > >>
> > >> if (ARRAY_SIZE(power-domains) == 1) {
> > >> of generic code will enable the power domain at .probe time
> > > we need to handle the voting directly. I recently shared a patch to
> > > vote cx gdsc from gpu driver. Maybe we can ignore this when gpu has
> > > only cx rail due to this logic you quoted here.
> > >
> > > I see that you have handled it mostly correctly from the gpu driver in the updated
> > > a6xx_pm_suspend() callback. Just the power domain device ptrs should be moved to
> > > gpu from gmu.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> opp APIs will default to scaling that domain with required-opps
> > >
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> and we do need to put GX/CX (with an MX parent to match) there, as the
> > >> AP is responsible for voting in this configuration
> > >
> > > We should vote to turn ON gx/cx headswitches through genpd from gpu driver. When you vote for
> > > core clk frequency, *clock driver is supposed to scale* all the necessary
> > > regulators. At least that is how downstream works. You can refer the downstream
> > > gpucc clk driver of these SoCs. I am not sure how much of that can be easily converted to
> > > upstream.
> > >
> > > Also, how does having a gmu dt node help in this regard? Feel free to
> > > elaborate, I am not very familiar with clk/regulator implementations.
> > Okay so I think we have a bit of a confusion here.
> >
> > Currently, with this patchset we manage things like this:
> >
> > 1. GPU has a VDD_GX (or equivalent[1]) line passed in power-domains=<>, which
> > is then used with OPP APIs to ensure it's being scaled on freq change [2].
> > The VDD_lines coming from RPM(h) are described as power domains upstream
> > *unlike downstream*, which represents them as regulators with preset voltage
> > steps (and perhaps that's what had you confused). What's more is that GDSCs
> > are also modeled as genpds instead of regulators, hence they sort of "fight"
> > for the spot in power-domains=<> of a given node.
>
> Thanks for clarifying. I didn't get this part "hence they sort of "fight" for the spot in power-domains".
> What spot exactly did you mean here? The spot for PD to be used during scaling?
>
> It seems like you are hinting that there is some sort of limitation in keeping all the
> 3 power domains (cx gdsc, gx gdsc and cx rail) under the gpu node in dt. Please explain
Typo. I meant "(Cx gdsc, Gx gdsc and Gx/Cx rail)"
> why we can't keep all the 3 power domains under gpu node and call an API
> (devm_pm_opp_attach_genpd() ??) to select the power domain which should be scaled?
>
> >
> > 2. GMU wrapper gets CX_GDSC & GX_GDSC handles in power-domains=<> (just like
> > the real GMU in the current state of upstream [3]), which are then governed
> > through explicit genpd calls to turn them on/off when the GPU resume/suspend/
> > crash recovery functions are called.
> >
> > 3. GPUs with GMU, like A630, don't get any power-domains=<> entries in DT,
> > instead relying on the GMU firmware to communicate necessary requests
> > to the VDD_xyz resources directly to RPMh, as part of the DVFS routines.
> > If GMU wasn't so smart, we would have to do the exact same VDD_xyz+OPP dance
> > there - that's precisely what's going on under the hood.
> >
> > 4. Adreno SMMU gets a handle to CX_GDSC so that when OF probe funcs are called,
> > (and SMMUs probe way way before all things drm) the headswitch is de-asserted
> > and its registers and related clocks are accessible.
> >
> >
> > All this makes me believe the way I generally architected things in
> > this series is correct.
> >
> >
> > [1] A610 (and I think A612) lack a VDD_GX line, so they power the GPU from
> > VDD_CX, but that's just an implementation detail which is handled by
> > simply passing the correct one in DTS, the code doesn't care.
> >
> > [2] Hence my recent changes to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate() wherever possible,
> > this func reads requires-opps in OPP table entries and ensures to elevate
> > the GENPD's performance state before switching frequencies
> >
> > [3] Please take a look at the "end product" here:
> > https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/fb16757c3bf4c087ac597d70c7a98755d46bb323
> > you can open e.g. sdm845.dtsi for comparison with real GMU
>
> This dt definition for a610 gpu clearly shows the issue I have here. Someone
> looking at this gets a very wrong picture about the platform like there is actually nothing
> resembling a gmu IP in a610. Is gmu or gmu-cx register region really present in this hw?
>
> Just a side note about the dt file you shared:
> 1. At line: 1243, It shouldn't have gx gdsc, right?
> 2. At line: 1172, SM6115_VDDCX -> SM6115_VDDGX?
Aah! ignore this. this gpu doesn't have Gx rail.
-Akhil
>
> -Akhil
>
> >
> > I hope this answers your concerns. If not, I'll be happy to elaborate.
> >
> > Konrad
> > >
> > > -Akhil.
> > >>
> > >> Konrad
> > >>>
> > >>> -Akhil
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If nothing else, this is a very convenient way to model a part of the
> > >>>> GPU (as that's essentially what GMU_CX is, to my understanding) and
> > >>>> the bindings people didn't shoot me in the head for proposing this, so
> > >>>> I assume it'd be cool to pursue this..
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Konrad
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> > >>>>>> ---
> > >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 72 +++++++-
> > >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 255 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h | 1 +
> > >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c | 14 +-
> > >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 8 +-
> > >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 6 +
> > >>>>>> 6 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> > >>>>>> index 87babbb2a19f..b1acdb027205 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> > >>>>>> @@ -1469,6 +1469,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_get_irq(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, struct platform_device *pdev,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
> > >>>>>> struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
> > >>>>>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(gmu->dev);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -1494,10 +1495,12 @@ void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> > >>>>>> gmu->mmio = NULL;
> > >>>>>> gmu->rscc = NULL;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_gmu_memory_free(gmu);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_gmu_memory_free(gmu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
> > >>>>>> - free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
> > >>>>>> + free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
> > >>>>>> + free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
> > >>>>>> put_device(gmu->dev);
> > >>>>>> @@ -1516,6 +1519,69 @@ static int cxpd_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > >>>>>> return 0;
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
> > >>>>>> +{
> > >>>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> > >>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
> > >>>>>> + int ret;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + if (!pdev)
> > >>>>>> + return -ENODEV;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + gmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
> > >>>>> why setup dma for a device that is not actually present?
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + pm_runtime_enable(gmu->dev);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Mark legacy for manual SPTPRAC control */
> > >>>>>> + gmu->legacy = true;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Map the GMU registers */
> > >>>>>> + gmu->mmio = a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(pdev, "gmu");
> > >>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->mmio)) {
> > >>>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->mmio);
> > >>>>>> + goto err_mmio;
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + gmu->cxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "cx");
> > >>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->cxpd)) {
> > >>>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->cxpd);
> > >>>>>> + goto err_mmio;
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + if (!device_link_add(gmu->dev, gmu->cxpd, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
> > >>>>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
> > >>>>>> + goto detach_cxpd;
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + init_completion(&gmu->pd_gate);
> > >>>>>> + complete_all(&gmu->pd_gate);
> > >>>>>> + gmu->pd_nb.notifier_call = cxpd_notifier_cb;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Get a link to the GX power domain to reset the GPU */
> > >>>>>> + gmu->gxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "gx");
> > >>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->gxpd)) {
> > >>>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->gxpd);
> > >>>>>> + goto err_mmio;
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + gmu->initialized = true;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + return 0;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> +detach_cxpd:
> > >>>>>> + dev_pm_domain_detach(gmu->cxpd, false);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> +err_mmio:
> > >>>>>> + iounmap(gmu->mmio);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
> > >>>>>> + put_device(gmu->dev);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + return ret;
> > >>>>>> +}
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > >>>>>> index 931f9f3b3a85..8e0345ffab81 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > >>>>>> @@ -20,9 +20,11 @@ static inline bool _a6xx_check_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > >>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - /* Check that the GMU is idle */
> > >>>>>> - if (!a6xx_gmu_isidle(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
> > >>>>>> - return false;
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> > >>>>>> + /* Check that the GMU is idle */
> > >>>>>> + if (!a6xx_gmu_isidle(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
> > >>>>>> + return false;
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* Check tha the CX master is idle */
> > >>>>>> if (gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_STATUS) &
> > >>>>>> @@ -612,13 +614,15 @@ static void a6xx_set_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool state)
> > >>>>>> return;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* Disable SP clock before programming HWCG registers */
> > >>>>>> - gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> for (i = 0; (reg = &adreno_gpu->info->hwcg[i], reg->offset); i++)
> > >>>>>> gpu_write(gpu, reg->offset, state ? reg->value : 0);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* Enable SP clock */
> > >>>>>> - gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL, state ? clock_cntl_on : 0);
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>> @@ -1018,10 +1022,13 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > >>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > >>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
> > >>>>>> int ret;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - /* Make sure the GMU keeps the GPU on while we set it up */
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> > >>>>>> + /* Make sure the GMU keeps the GPU on while we set it up */
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* Clear GBIF halt in case GX domain was not collapsed */
> > >>>>>> if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> @@ -1144,6 +1151,17 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> 0x3f0243f0);
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> > >>>>>> + /* Do it here, as GMU wrapper only inits the GMU for memory reservation etc. */
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Set up the CX GMU counter 0 to count busy ticks */
> > >>>>>> + gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_AO_GPU_CX_BUSY_MASK, 0xff000000);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Enable power counter 0 */
> > >>>>>> + gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_SELECT_0, 0xff, BIT(5));
> > >>>>>> + gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_ENABLE, 1);
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> /* Protect registers from the CP */
> > >>>>>> a6xx_set_cp_protect(gpu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -1233,6 +1251,8 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> out:
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + return ret;
> > >>>>>> /*
> > >>>>>> * Tell the GMU that we are done touching the GPU and it can start power
> > >>>>>> * management
> > >>>>>> @@ -1267,6 +1287,9 @@ static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> adreno_dump(gpu);
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +#define GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK BIT(0)
> > >>>>>> +#define GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK BIT(0)
> > >>>>>> +#define GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK BIT(1)
> > >>>>>> #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_TIMEOUT 100
> > >>>>>> #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK 0x00f0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -1299,7 +1322,8 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> * Turn off keep alive that might have been enabled by the hang
> > >>>>>> * interrupt
> > >>>>>> */
> > >>>>>> - gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 0);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 0);
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Maybe it is better to move this to a6xx_gmu_force_power_off.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -1329,6 +1353,32 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> dev_pm_genpd_remove_notifier(gmu->cxpd);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> + /* Software-reset the GPU */
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is not soft reset sequence. We are trying to quiescent gpu - ddr
> > >>>>> traffic with this sequence.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> > >>>>>> + /* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
> > >>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
> > >>>>>> + spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
> > >>>>>> + GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Halt new client requests on GBIF */
> > >>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
> > >>>>>> + spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
> > >>>>>> + (GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK)) == GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Halt all AXI requests on GBIF */
> > >>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK);
> > >>>>>> + spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
> > >>>>>> + (GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK)) == GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Clear the halts */
> > >>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, 0);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* This *really* needs to go through before we do anything else! */
> > >>>>>> + mb();
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This sequence should be before we collapse cx gdsc. Also, please see if
> > >>>>> we can create a subroutine to avoid code dup.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> if (active_submits)
> > >>>>>> @@ -1463,7 +1513,8 @@ static void a6xx_fault_detect_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> * Force the GPU to stay on until after we finish
> > >>>>>> * collecting information
> > >>>>>> */
> > >>>>>> - gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 1);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 1);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
> > >>>>>> "gpu fault ring %d fence %x status %8.8X rb %4.4x/%4.4x ib1 %16.16llX/%4.4x ib2 %16.16llX/%4.4x\n",
> > >>>>>> @@ -1624,7 +1675,7 @@ static void a6xx_llc_slices_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > >>>>>> a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > >>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > >>>>>> @@ -1644,10 +1695,61 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> a6xx_llc_activate(a6xx_gpu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - return 0;
> > >>>>>> + return ret;
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> +static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> +{
> > >>>>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > >>>>>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > >>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
> > >>>>>> + unsigned long freq = 0;
> > >>>>>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> > >>>>>> + int ret;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + gpu->needs_hw_init = true;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> > >>>>> I think we can ignore gmu lock as there is no real gmu device.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->dev);
> > >>>>>> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->gxpd);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Set the core clock, having VDD scaling in mind */
> > >>>>>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&gpu->pdev->dev, gpu->fast_rate);
> > >>>>>> + if (ret)
> > >>>>>> + goto err_core_clk;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
> > >>>>>> + if (ret)
> > >>>>>> + goto err_bulk_clk;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpu->ebi1_clk);
> > >>>>>> + if (ret)
> > >>>>>> + goto err_mem_clk;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
> > >>>>>> + if (ret) {
> > >>>>>> +err_mem_clk:
> > >>>>>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
> > >>>>>> +err_bulk_clk:
> > >>>>>> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(&gpu->pdev->dev, &freq);
> > >>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> > >>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&gpu->pdev->dev, 0);
> > >>>>>> +err_core_clk:
> > >>>>>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
> > >>>>>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + if (!ret)
> > >>>>>> + msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + return ret;
> > >>>>>> +}
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > >>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > >>>>>> @@ -1674,11 +1776,62 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> return 0;
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> +{
> > >>>>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > >>>>>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > >>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
> > >>>>>> + unsigned long freq = 0;
> > >>>>>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> > >>>>>> + int i, ret;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + trace_msm_gpu_suspend(0);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(&gpu->pdev->dev, &freq);
> > >>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(gpu->ebi1_clk);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Set frequency to the minimum supported level (no 27MHz on A6xx!) */
> > >>>>>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&gpu->pdev->dev, freq);
> > >>>>>> + if (ret)
> > >>>>>> + goto err;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->gxpd);
> > >>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->dev);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + if (a6xx_gpu->shadow_bo)
> > >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++)
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_gpu->shadow[i] = 0;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + gpu->suspend_count++;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + return 0;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> +err:
> > >>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + return ret;
> > >>>>>> +}
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > >>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> > >>>>>> + *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER);
> > >>>>>> + return 0;
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>> Instead of wrapper check here, we can just create a separate op. I don't
> > >>>>> see any benefit in reusing the same function here.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
> > >>>>>> @@ -1716,7 +1869,8 @@ static void a6xx_destroy(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> drm_gem_object_put(a6xx_gpu->shadow_bo);
> > >> 6xx_pm_suspend >>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_llc_slices_destroy(a6xx_gpu);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_llc_slices_destroy(a6xx_gpu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> > >>>>>> a6xx_gmu_remove(a6xx_gpu);
> > >>>>>> @@ -1957,8 +2111,8 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
> > >>>>>> .set_param = adreno_set_param,
> > >>>>>> .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
> > >>>>>> .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
> > >>>>>> - .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
> > >>>>>> - .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
> > >>>>>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend,
> > >>>>>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_gmu_pm_resume,
> > >>>>>> .recover = a6xx_recover,
> > >>>>>> .submit = a6xx_submit,
> > >>>>>> .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
> > >>>>>> @@ -1982,6 +2136,35 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
> > >>>>>> .get_timestamp = a6xx_get_timestamp,
> > >>>>>> };
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs_gmuwrapper = {
> > >>>>>> + .base = {
> > >>>>>> + .get_param = adreno_get_param,
> > >>>>>> + .set_param = adreno_set_param,
> > >>>>>> + .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
> > >>>>>> + .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
> > >>>>>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
> > >>>>>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
> > >>>>>> + .recover = a6xx_recover,
> > >>>>>> + .submit = a6xx_submit,
> > >>>>>> + .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
> > >>>>>> + .irq = a6xx_irq,
> > >>>>>> + .destroy = a6xx_destroy,
> > >>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
> > >>>>>> + .show = a6xx_show,
> > >>>>>> +#endif
> > >>>>>> + .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy,
> > >>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
> > >>>>>> + .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
> > >>>>>> + .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
> > >>>>>> +#endif
> > >>>>>> + .create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
> > >>>>>> + .create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
> > >>>>>> + .get_rptr = a6xx_get_rptr,
> > >>>>>> + .progress = a6xx_progress,
> > >>>>>> + },
> > >>>>>> + .get_timestamp = a6xx_get_timestamp,
> > >>>>>> +};
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> > >>>>>> @@ -2003,18 +2186,36 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> adreno_gpu->registers = NULL;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> + /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
> > >>>>>> + node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
> > >>>>>> + /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
> > >>>>>> + BUG_ON(!node);
> > >>>>> How will you handle this BUG() when there is no GMU (a610 gpu)?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + adreno_gpu->gmu_is_wrapper = of_device_is_compatible(node, "qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper");
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> /*
> > >>>>>> * We need to know the platform type before calling into adreno_gpu_init
> > >>>>>> * so that the hw_apriv flag can be correctly set. Snoop into the info
> > >>>>>> * and grab the revision number
> > >>>>>> */
> > >>>>>> info = adreno_info(config->rev);
> > >>>>>> -
> > >>>>>> - if (info && (info->revn == 650 || info->revn == 660 ||
> > >>>>>> - adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 3, 5, ANY_ID), info->rev)))
> > >>>>>> + if (!info)
> > >>>>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* Assign these early so that we can use the is_aXYZ helpers */
> > >>>>>> + /* Numeric revision IDs (e.g. 630) */
> > >>>>>> + adreno_gpu->revn = info->revn;
> > >>>>>> + /* New-style ADRENO_REV()-only */
> > >>>>>> + adreno_gpu->rev = info->rev;
> > >>>>>> + /* Quirk data */
> > >>>>>> + adreno_gpu->info = info;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a660_family(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> adreno_gpu->base.hw_apriv = true;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_llc_slices_init(pdev, a6xx_gpu);
> > >>>>>> + /* No LLCC on non-RPMh (and by extension, non-GMU) SoCs */
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_llc_slices_init(pdev, a6xx_gpu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ret = a6xx_set_supported_hw(&pdev->dev, config->rev);
> > >>>>>> if (ret) {
> > >>>>>> @@ -2022,7 +2223,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >>>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_gmuwrapper, 1);
> > >>>>>> + else
> > >>>>>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
> > >>>>>> if (ret) {
> > >>>>>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
> > >>>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > >>>>>> @@ -2035,13 +2239,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >>>>>> if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_7c3(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> priv->gpu_clamp_to_idle = true;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
> > >>>>>> - node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
> > >>>>>> -
> > >>>>>> - /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
> > >>>>>> - BUG_ON(!node);
> > >>>>>> -
> > >>>>>> - ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> > >>>>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
> > >>>>>> + else
> > >>>>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
> > >>>>>> of_node_put(node);
> > >>>>>> if (ret) {
> > >>>>>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> > >>>>>> index eea2e60ce3b7..51a7656072fa 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> > >>>>>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
> > >>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
> > >>>>>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
> > >>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> > >>>>>> index 30ecdff363e7..4e5d650578c6 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> > >>>>>> @@ -1041,16 +1041,18 @@ struct msm_gpu_state *a6xx_gpu_state_get(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> /* Get the generic state from the adreno core */
> > >>>>>> adreno_gpu_state_get(gpu, &a6xx_state->base);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> > >>>>> nit: Kinda misleading function name to a layman. Should we invert the
> > >>>>> function to "adreno_has_gmu"?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Akhil
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
> > >>>>>> + a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* If GX isn't on the rest of the data isn't going to be accessible */
> > >>>>>> - if (!a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
> > >>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && !a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
> > >>>>>> return &a6xx_state->base;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /* Get the banks of indexed registers */
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > >>>>>> index 6934cee07d42..5c5901d65950 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > >>>>>> @@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ int adreno_load_fw(struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu)
> > >>>>>> if (!adreno_gpu->info->fw[i])
> > >>>>>> continue;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> + /* Skip loading GMU firwmare with GMU Wrapper */
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && i == ADRENO_FW_GMU)
> > >>>>>> + continue;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> /* Skip if the firmware has already been loaded */
> > >>>>>> if (adreno_gpu->fw[i])
> > >>>>>> continue;
> > >>>>>> @@ -1074,8 +1078,8 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
> > >>>>>> u32 speedbin;
> > >>>>>> int ret;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use */
> > >>>>>> - if (config->rev.core < 6) {
> > >>>>>> + /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use (or is absent). */
> > >>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || config->rev.core < 6) {
> > >>>>>> /*
> > >>>>>> * This can only be done before devm_pm_opp_of_add_table(), or
> > >>>>>> * dev_pm_opp_set_config() will WARN_ON()
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> > >>>>>> index f62612a5c70f..ee5352bc5329 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> > >>>>>> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct adreno_gpu {
> > >>>>>> * code (a3xx_gpu.c) and stored in this common location.
> > >>>>>> */
> > >>>>>> const unsigned int *reg_offsets;
> > >>>>>> + bool gmu_is_wrapper;
> > >>>>>> };
> > >>>>>> #define to_adreno_gpu(x) container_of(x, struct adreno_gpu, base)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -145,6 +146,11 @@ struct adreno_platform_config {
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> bool adreno_cmp_rev(struct adreno_rev rev1, struct adreno_rev rev2);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +static inline bool adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> +{
> > >>>>>> + return gpu->gmu_is_wrapper;
> > >>>>>> +}
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> static inline bool adreno_is_a2xx(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
> > >>>>>> {
> > >>>>>> return (gpu->revn < 300);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> 2.40.0
> > >>>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists