lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR21MB1688A75D614165C5E4E0302AD7709@BYAPR21MB1688.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 May 2023 04:14:08 +0000
From:   "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
        Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        "linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
        Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@...zon.com>
Subject: RE: [patch V2 38/38] x86/smpboot/64: Implement
 arch_cpuhp_init_parallel_bringup() and enable it

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2023 9:23 AM
> 
> On Sat, May 06 2023 at 00:53, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 12:03 PM
> > [snip]
> >
> >> @@ -934,10 +961,10 @@ static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int ap
> >>  	if (!node_width)
> >>  		node_width = num_digits(num_possible_nodes()) + 1; /* + '#' */
> >>
> >> -	if (cpu == 1)
> >> -		printk(KERN_INFO "x86: Booting SMP configuration:\n");
> >> -
> >>  	if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> >> +		if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> >
> > Unfortunately, this new check doesn't work.  Here's the output I get:
> >
> > [    0.721384] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> > [    0.725359] smpboot: x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> > [    0.729249] .... node  #0, CPUs:        #2
> > [    0.729654] smpboot: x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> > [    0.737247]       #4
> >
> > Evidently num_online_cpus() isn't updated until after all the primary
> > siblings get started.
> 
> Duh. Where is that brown paperbag?
> 
> > When booting with cpuhp.parallel=0, the output is good.
> 
> Exactly that was on the command line when I quickly booted that change :(
> 
> The below should fix it for real.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -951,9 +951,9 @@ static int wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init
>  /* reduce the number of lines printed when booting a large cpu count system */
>  static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int apicid)
>  {
> +	static int width, node_width, first = 1;
>  	static int current_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>  	int node = early_cpu_to_node(cpu);
> -	static int width, node_width;
> 
>  	if (!width)
>  		width = num_digits(num_possible_cpus()) + 1; /* + '#' sign */
> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int ap
>  		node_width = num_digits(num_possible_nodes()) + 1; /* + '#' */
> 
>  	if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> -		if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> +		if (first)
>  			pr_info("x86: Booting SMP configuration:\n");
> 
>  		if (node != current_node) {
> @@ -975,11 +975,11 @@ static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int ap
>  		}
> 
>  		/* Add padding for the BSP */
> -		if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> +		if (first)
>  			pr_cont("%*s", width + 1, " ");
> +		first = 0;
> 
>  		pr_cont("%*s#%d", width - num_digits(cpu), " ", cpu);
> -
>  	} else
>  		pr_info("Booting Node %d Processor %d APIC 0x%x\n",
>  			node, cpu, apicid);

This works.  dmesg output is clean for these guest VM combinations
on Hyper-V that I tested:

* Normal VM:  16 vCPUs in 1 NUMA node and 32 vCPUs in 2 NUMA nodes
* Same configs for a SEV-SNP Confidential VM with paravisor

Tested with and without cpuhp.parallel=0

For the entire series:
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ