[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230507105045.085fa058@slackpad.lan>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 10:50:45 +0100
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc: Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: spi: sun6i: add DT bindings for
Allwinner R329/D1/R528/T113s SPI
On Sun, 07 May 2023 12:06:58 +0800
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io> wrote:
Hi,
> 在 2023-05-07星期日的 02:26 +0300,Maksim Kiselev写道:
> > Listed above Allwinner SoCs has two SPI controllers. First is the
> > regular
> > SPI controller and the second one has additional functionality for
> > MIPI-DBI Type C.
> >
> > Add compatible strings for these controllers
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi.yaml | 7
> > +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-
> > a31-spi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-
> > a31-spi.yaml
> > index de36c6a34a0f..807dde457e3b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-
> > spi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-
> > spi.yaml
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
> > oneOf:
> > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi
> > - const: allwinner,sun8i-h3-spi
> > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-r329-spi
> > - items:
> > - enum:
> > - allwinner,sun8i-r40-spi
> > @@ -28,6 +29,12 @@ properties:
> > - allwinner,sun50i-h616-spi
> > - allwinner,suniv-f1c100s-spi
> > - const: allwinner,sun8i-h3-spi
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - allwinner,sun20i-d1-spi
> > + - allwinner,sun20i-d1-spi-dbi
This construct doesn't cover the three compatible string case, since we
only get to choose from one of the enums, and always have two strings -
hence my challenge to find the shortest sequence ;-)
> In this case I will prefer to list all 4 compatibles if backward
> compatibility is used:
> "allwinner,sun20i-d1-spi-dbi", "allwinner-sun20i-d1-spi",
> "allwinner,sun50i-r329-spi-dbi", "allwinner, sun50i-r329-spi", in case
> if we were gaining support for either quirks of D1 controller or
> SPI_DBI controllers.
I see where you are coming from, but that order doesn't look right,
since we go back from DBI to normal and then back again. And
"allwinner-sun20i-d1-spi" is not a super set of
"allwinner,sun50i-r329-spi-dbi".
In case we will need a D1 quirk, we could key this to the D1 DBI
compatible as well, I think, so this three string version should work.
Cheers,
Andre
>
> > + - allwinner,sun50i-r329-spi-dbi
> > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-r329-spi
> >
> > reg:
> > maxItems: 1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists