lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24a5daa4-2c6c-781d-bbb3-8f5a4f035c08@infradead.org>
Date:   Sun, 7 May 2023 21:53:16 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of Linus' tree



On 5/7/23 21:52, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/7/23 21:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
>> produced these warnings:
>>
>> kernel/sched/core.c:11496: warning: Cannot understand  * @cid_lock: Guarantee forward-progress of cid allocation.
>>  on line 11496 - I thought it was a doc line
>> kernel/sched/core.c:11505: warning: Cannot understand  * @use_cid_lock: Select cid allocation behavior: lock-free vs spinlock.
>>  on line 11505 - I thought it was a doc line
>>
>> Introduced by commit
>>
>>   223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
>>
> 
> I have sent a patch:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230428031111.322-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
> but haven't seen any replies to it (possibly due to the merge window or travel).
> 

Oops, Peter did reply, but no info on merging it.

-- 
~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ