[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230508014436.198717-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 09:44:31 +0800
From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Guohanjun <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v9 0/5]arm64: add machine check safe support
With the increase of memory capacity and density, the probability of memory
error also increases. The increasing size and density of server RAM in data
centers and clouds have shown increased uncorrectable memory errors.
Currently, the kernel has mechanism to recover from hardware memory errors.
This patchset provides a new recovery mechanism.
For arm64, the hardware memory error handling in do_sea(), which is divided
into two cases:
1. If the user state consumed the memory errors, the solution is to kill
the user process and isolate the error page.
2. If the kernel state consumed the memory errors, the solution is to
panic.
For case 2, Undifferentiated panic may not be the optimal choice, as it can
be handled better. In some scenarios, we can avoid panic, such as uaccess,
if the uaccess fails due to memory error, only the user process will be
affected, killing the user process and isolating the user page with
hardware memory errors is a better choice.
Since V8:
1. Rebase to latest kernel version and fix topo in some of the patches.
2. According to the suggestion of Catalin, I attempted to modify the
return value of function copy_mc_[user]_highpage() to bytes not copied.
During the modification process, I found that it would be more
reasonable to return -EFAULT when copy error occurs (referring to the
newly added patch 4).
For ARM64, the implementation of copy_mc_[user]_highpage() needs to
consider MTE. Considering the scenario where data copying is successful
but the MTE tag copying fails, it is also not reasonable to return
bytes not copied.
3. Considering the recent addition of machine check safe support for
multiple scenarios, modify commit message for patch 5 (patch 4 for V8).
Since V7:
Currently, there are patches supporting recover from poison
consumption for the cow scenario[1]. Therefore, Supporting cow
scenario under the arm64 architecture only needs to modify the relevant
code under the arch/.
[1]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221031201029.102123-1-tony.luck@intel.com/
Since V6:
Resend patches that are not merged into the mainline in V6.
Since V5:
1. Add patch2/3 to add uaccess assembly helpers.
2. Optimize the implementation logic of arm64_do_kernel_sea() in patch8.
3. Remove kernel access fixup in patch9.
All suggestion are from Mark.
Since V4:
1. According Michael's suggestion, add patch5.
2. According Mark's suggestiog, do some restructuring to arm64
extable, then a new adaptation of machine check safe support is made based
on this.
3. According Mark's suggestion, support machine check safe in do_mte() in
cow scene.
4. In V4, two patches have been merged into -next, so V5 not send these
two patches.
Since V3:
1. According to Robin's suggestion, direct modify user_ldst and
user_ldp in asm-uaccess.h and modify mte.S.
2. Add new macro USER_MC in asm-uaccess.h, used in copy_from_user.S
and copy_to_user.S.
3. According to Robin's suggestion, using micro in copy_page_mc.S to
simplify code.
4. According to KeFeng's suggestion, modify powerpc code in patch1.
5. According to KeFeng's suggestion, modify mm/extable.c and some code
optimization.
Since V2:
1. According to Mark's suggestion, all uaccess can be recovered due to
memory error.
2. Scenario pagecache reading is also supported as part of uaccess
(copy_to_user()) and duplication code problem is also solved.
Thanks for Robin's suggestion.
3. According Mark's suggestion, update commit message of patch 2/5.
4. According Borisllav's suggestion, update commit message of patch 1/5.
Since V1:
1.Consistent with PPC/x86, Using CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC instead of
ARM64_UCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY.
2.Add two new scenes, cow and pagecache reading.
3.Fix two small bug(the first two patch).
V1 in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220323033705.3966643-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com/
Tong Tiangen (5):
uaccess: add generic fallback version of copy_mc_to_user()
arm64: add support for machine check error safe
arm64: add uaccess to machine check safe
mm/hwpoison: return -EFAULT when copy fail in
copy_mc_[user]_highpage()
arm64: support copy_mc_[user]_highpage()
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-extable.h | 15 +++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 4 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h | 5 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h | 10 ++++
arch/arm64/lib/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm64/lib/copy_mc_page.S | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/lib/mte.S | 27 +++++++++
arch/arm64/mm/copypage.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++---
arch/arm64/mm/extable.c | 21 ++++++-
arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 29 ++++++++-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
include/linux/highmem.h | 12 ++--
include/linux/uaccess.h | 9 +++
mm/khugepaged.c | 4 +-
17 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/lib/copy_mc_page.S
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists