[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556d9ea2-d4a0-88fc-e803-308310bc35e8@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 19:43:34 +0530
From: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
To: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<quic_gurus@...cinc.com>, <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
<quic_eberman@...cinc.com>, <robimarko@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>, <quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>,
<quic_anusha@...cinc.com>, <quic_poovendh@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add IPQ5018 APCS
compatible
On 3/7/2023 11:35 AM, Kathiravan T wrote:
>
> On 3/7/2023 10:11 AM, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>> Add compatible for the Qualcomm IPQ5018 APCS block.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
>> index 9a46dbc6d03f..91f4e0454fe3 100644
>> ---
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
>> +++
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>> - const: qcom,ipq6018-apcs-apps-global
>> - items:
>> - enum:
>> + - qcom,ipq5018-apcs-apps-global
>
> No, we can use the fallback mechanism as done for IPQ5332. Please
> refer
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230217083308.12017-5-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com/
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kathiravan T.
>
Sure. I will also use same fallback mechanism for IPQ5018.
Thanks & Regards,
Manikanta.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists