lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4ccade7-cfb9-6362-703d-f74308bdc313@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2023 16:36:50 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Zeynep Arslanbenzer <Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@...log.com>
Cc:     sre@...nel.org, Nurettin Bolucu <Nurettin.Bolucu@...log.com>,
        broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: power: supply: max77658: Add ADI
 MAX77654/58/59 Charger

On 08/05/2023 16:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, 08 May 2023 16:10:40 +0300, Zeynep Arslanbenzer wrote:
>> Add ADI MAX77654/58/59 power supply devicetree document.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nurettin Bolucu <Nurettin.Bolucu@...log.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zeynep Arslanbenzer <Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@...log.com>
>> ---
>>  .../power/supply/adi,max77658-charger.yaml    | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/adi,max77658-charger.yaml
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/adi,max77658-charger.yaml: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/adi,max77658.yaml

This can be ignored, there is a kind of circular dependency so it's fine.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ