[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230508160829.2756405-2-vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 12:08:29 -0400
From: Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>
To: luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: sched/deadline: Update GRUB description
Update the details of GRUB to reflect the updated logic.
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@...byteword.org>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst
index 9d9be52f221a..0c73f07f712d 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst
@@ -195,11 +195,15 @@ Deadline Task Scheduling
its utilization is added to the active utilization of the runqueue where
it has been enqueued.
- For each runqueue, the algorithm GRUB keeps track of two different bandwidths:
+ For each runqueue, the algorithm GRUB keeps track of three different bandwidths:
- Active bandwidth (running_bw): this is the sum of the bandwidths of all
tasks in active state (i.e., ActiveContending or ActiveNonContending);
+ - Active bandwidth of SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM tasks(reclaim_bw): this is the sum of
+ bandwidth of all tasks in active state which participates in GRUB. This is a
+ subset of running_bw and is needed for reclaimable bandwidth calculation.
+
- Total bandwidth (this_bw): this is the sum of all tasks "belonging" to the
runqueue, including the tasks in Inactive state.
@@ -209,12 +213,12 @@ Deadline Task Scheduling
to
dq = -max{ Ui / Umax, (1 - Uinact - Uextra) } dt
+ dq = -(Ureclaim / (Uextra + Uinact + Ureclaim)) dt
where:
- - Ui is the bandwidth of task Ti;
- - Umax is the maximum reclaimable utilization (subjected to RT throttling
- limits);
+ - Ureclaim is the (per runqueue) bandwidth of all SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM tasks
+ in active state;
- Uinact is the (per runqueue) inactive utilization, computed as
(this_bq - running_bw);
- Uextra is the (per runqueue) extra reclaimable utilization
@@ -222,7 +226,8 @@ Deadline Task Scheduling
Let's now see a trivial example of two deadline tasks with runtime equal
- to 4 and period equal to 8 (i.e., bandwidth equal to 0.5)::
+ to 4 and period equal to 8 (i.e., bandwidth equal to 0.5). Tasks are
+ allowed to use the whole cpu(Umax = 1)::
A Task T1
|
@@ -244,7 +249,7 @@ Deadline Task Scheduling
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
- A running_bw
+ A reclaim_bw
|
1 ----------------- ------
| | |
@@ -272,7 +277,7 @@ Deadline Task Scheduling
This is the 0-lag time for Task T1. Since it didn't woken up in the
meantime, it enters the Inactive state. Its bandwidth is removed from
- running_bw.
+ running_bw and reclaim_bw.
Task T2 continues its execution. However, its runtime is now decreased as
dq = - 0.5 dt because Uinact = 0.5.
Task T2 therefore reclaims the bandwidth unused by Task T1.
@@ -280,7 +285,7 @@ Deadline Task Scheduling
- Time t = 8:
Task T1 wakes up. It enters the ActiveContending state again, and the
- running_bw is incremented.
+ running_bw and reclaim_bw are incremented.
2.3 Energy-aware scheduling
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists