linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add dummy io_uring_sqe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0df23fc9-fcfe-cb53-3ee6-ced88751451e@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2023 12:10:35 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>,
        Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add dummy io_uring_sqe_cmd() helper

On 5/8/23 8:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Add a dummy function like the other interfaces for this configuration.
> 
> Why do we need a separate dummy? The structure is unconditionally
> defined, so we can just unconditionally define the helper.

Yeah, no reason for a special one. I'll send one out.

-- 
Jens Axboe