linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use $KBUILD_BUILD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 21:03:28 +0200
From:   Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use $KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP as man page date

Hi Peter, Ingo, Arnaldo,

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This allows man pages to be built reproducibly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> ---
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/Makefile
> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ endif
>  ifdef DOCBOOK_SUPPRESS_SP
>  XMLTO_EXTRA += -m manpage-suppress-sp.xsl
>  endif
> +ifdef KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP
> +ASCIIDOC_EXTRA += -a revdate=$(shell date -u -d '$(KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP)' +%Y-%m-%d)
> +endif
>  
>  SHELL_PATH ?= $(SHELL)
>  # Shell quote;
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/asciidoc.conf
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/asciidoc.conf
> @@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ ifdef::backend-docbook[]
>  [header]
>  template::[header-declarations]
>  <refentry>
> +<refentryinfo>
> +template::[docinfo]
> +</refentryinfo>
>  <refmeta>
>  <refentrytitle>{mantitle}</refentrytitle>
>  <manvolnum>{manvolnum}</manvolnum>

As we do apply the change in Downstream in Debian, I was wondering if
it just felt trough the cracks and could still be applied. Is there
anything missing?

Regards,
Salvatore