linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.3 000/694] 6.3.2-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023050932-avenging-annex-0cef@gregkh>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 05:02:58 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.3 000/694] 6.3.2-rc1 review

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 03:46:02PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/8/23 02:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.3.2 release.
> > There are 694 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 10 May 2023 09:42:40 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.3.2-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.3.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> We also need to bring in this patch from upstream:
> 
> 3522340199cc060b70f0094e3039bdb43c3f6ee1 ("arch_topology: Remove early
> cacheinfo error message if -ENOENT") otherwise we will be spitting out the
> "Early cacheinfo failed, ret = " messages on boot.

Now queued up, thanks!

greg k-h