linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rust: lock: Reflow long documentation line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 21:39:01 +0100
From:   Ben Gooding <ben.gooding.dev@...il.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     alice@...l.io, alex.gaynor@...il.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
        bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojeda@...nel.org,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, wedsonaf@...il.com,
        yakoyoku@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: lock: Reflow long documentation line

Hi Miguel,

On 08/05/2023 21:37, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 6:27 PM Ben Gooding <ben.gooding.dev@...il.com> wrote:
>> Suggested-by: Alice Ryhl <alice@...l.io>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Gooding <ben.gooding.dev@...il.com>
> Thanks for the patch! Several notes:
>
>    - Missing commit message -- in general, please check your patches
> with `scripts/checkpatch.pl` and please read
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html.
>
>    - This patch goes on top of the previous one you sent but, in the
> kernel workflow, what you are expected to do is send a v2 of your
> patch series instead. You can use `-v2` in `git format-patch` for
> that.
>
>    - This patch is not just reflowing as the title implies, but it also
> changes the style of the link -- is there a reason for that? If yes,
> this should be explained.
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel

Thank you very much for your feedback, this is really helpful as I'm 
learning the process.

I've submitted a proper v2 of my patch based on your feedback which is 
hopefully much more like what you would expect - please let me know.

Many thanks,

Ben