linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/32] mm: Bring back vmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230509214319.GA858791@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 14:43:19 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/32] mm: Bring back vmalloc_exec

On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 02:12:41PM -0700, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 01:46:09PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 12:56:32PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
> > >
> > > This is needed for bcachefs, which dynamically generates per-btree node
> > > unpack functions.
> >
> > No, we will never add back a way for random code allocating executable
> > memory in kernel space.
> 
> Yeah I think I glossed over this aspect a bit as it looks ostensibly like simply
> reinstating a helper function because the code is now used in more than one
> place (at lsf/mm so a little distracted :)
> 
> But it being exported is a problem. Perhaps there's another way of acheving the
> same aim without having to do so?

I already trolled Kent with this on IRC, but for the parts of bcachefs
that want better assembly code than whatever gcc generates from the C
source, could you compile code to BPF and then let the BPF JIT engines
turn that into machine code for you?

(also distracted by LSFMM)

--D