linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] regulator: tps65219: Fix matching interrupts for their regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 09 May 2023 15:39:11 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jerome Neanne <jneanne@...libre.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...libre.com, msp@...libre.com,
        j-keerthy@...com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] regulator: tps65219: Fix matching interrupts
 for their regulators

On Sun, 07 May 2023 16:46:56 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The driver's probe() first registers regulators in a loop and then in a
> second loop passes them as irq data to the interrupt handlers.  However
> the function to get the regulator for given name
> tps65219_get_rdev_by_name() was a no-op due to argument passed by value,
> not pointer, thus the second loop assigned always same value - from
> previous loop.  The interrupts, when fired, where executed with wrong
> data.  Compiler also noticed it:
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: tps65219: Fix matching interrupts for their regulators
      commit: f050e56de80591fee55bedbdf5b6b998c740cd0c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark