linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/22] scsi: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() to create ordered workqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZFmgXcSadQpizbwI@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2023 15:22:37 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     jiangshanlai@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/22] scsi: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() to create
 ordered workqueues

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:57:30PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Applied to wq/for-6.5-cleanup-ordered.

Oops, strike that. All scsi core workqueues have WQ_SYSFS set which means
that their max_active could be adjusted upwards through sysfs. The shouldn't
be ordered workqueues. This only leaves NCR5380 the only remaining
conversion candidate; however, that one only uses a single work item, so the
better thing to do there is using the default @max_active instead.

I'm dropping this patch and will add a patch for NCR5380 in the next round.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun