linux-kernel - Re: RE: [PATCH] can: length: add definitions for frame lengths in bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZ6RqLh1kQvCaGwjOS2fQuLAVuF_XJyAEqLtS89ufxBRhXvWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 17:14:40 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thomas.Kopp@...rochip.com, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        marex@...x.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH] can: length: add definitions for frame lengths in bits

On Tue. 9 May 2023 at 15:50, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On 09.05.2023 13:16:08, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> > > The diagram in https://www.can-cia.org/can-knowledge/can/can-fd/
> > > suggests that IMF is part of the frame.
> >
> > ISO 11898-1:2015 section 10.4.6 "Specification of inter-frame space"
> > makes it clear that the intermission is not part of the frame but part
> > of the "Inter-frame space".
>
> For this reason, it is good to have open standards...oh wait!

It is open is you (or your company, wink, wink) pay CHF 187:

  https://www.iso.org/standard/63648.html