[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230509082153.jcy2qpvyd44bjaee@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 10:21:53 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:16:42AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
> only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
> and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
> function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
> Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
> now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:11:25AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> writes:
> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > >> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> > >> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > >
> > > I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> > > up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
> >
> > Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
> > driver.
> >
> > Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
> > provided by this driver?
>
> I googled for the function names but the only related hits were
> references to this thread :-)
>
> > I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
> > it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
> > driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.
>
> fair enough, here it is.
What is your thought about this patch? If you (also) think getting it
into next soon after a merge window closed, around now would be a good
opportunity to do so ..
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists