[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b3aef9e-53ae-d96d-8a8d-5c005a333330@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 10:18:05 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: imx-ocotp: set varaiable imx_ocotp_layout
 storage-class-specifier to static
On 04/04/2023 19:31, Tom Rix wrote:
> smatch reports
> drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c:599:21: warning: symbol
>    'imx_ocotp_layout' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> This variable is only used in one file so should be static.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
Applied thanks,
--srini
>   drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> index ac0edb6398f1..fcea9c04be96 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static void imx_ocotp_fixup_cell_info(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>   	cell->read_post_process = imx_ocotp_cell_pp;
>   }
>   
> -struct nvmem_layout imx_ocotp_layout = {
> +static struct nvmem_layout imx_ocotp_layout = {
>   	.fixup_cell_info = imx_ocotp_fixup_cell_info,
>   };
>   
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
