[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b3aef9e-53ae-d96d-8a8d-5c005a333330@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 10:18:05 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: imx-ocotp: set varaiable imx_ocotp_layout
storage-class-specifier to static
On 04/04/2023 19:31, Tom Rix wrote:
> smatch reports
> drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c:599:21: warning: symbol
> 'imx_ocotp_layout' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> This variable is only used in one file so should be static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
Applied thanks,
--srini
> drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> index ac0edb6398f1..fcea9c04be96 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static void imx_ocotp_fixup_cell_info(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> cell->read_post_process = imx_ocotp_cell_pp;
> }
>
> -struct nvmem_layout imx_ocotp_layout = {
> +static struct nvmem_layout imx_ocotp_layout = {
> .fixup_cell_info = imx_ocotp_fixup_cell_info,
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists