[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230509015032.3768622-3-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 15:50:21 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@....com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/13] wifi: mwifiex: Use default @max_active for workqueues
These workqueues only host a single work item and thus doen't need explicit
concurrency limit. Let's use the default @max_active. This doesn't cost
anything and clearly expresses that @max_active doesn't matter.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>
Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>
Cc: Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@....com>
Cc: Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
index bcd564dc3554..5337ee4b6f10 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
@@ -3127,7 +3127,7 @@ struct wireless_dev *mwifiex_add_virtual_intf(struct wiphy *wiphy,
priv->dfs_cac_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("MWIFIEX_DFS_CAC%s",
WQ_HIGHPRI |
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM |
- WQ_UNBOUND, 1, name);
+ WQ_UNBOUND, 0, name);
if (!priv->dfs_cac_workqueue) {
mwifiex_dbg(adapter, ERROR, "cannot alloc DFS CAC queue\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -3138,7 +3138,7 @@ struct wireless_dev *mwifiex_add_virtual_intf(struct wiphy *wiphy,
priv->dfs_chan_sw_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("MWIFIEX_DFS_CHSW%s",
WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_UNBOUND |
- WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1, name);
+ WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0, name);
if (!priv->dfs_chan_sw_workqueue) {
mwifiex_dbg(adapter, ERROR, "cannot alloc DFS channel sw queue\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c
index ea22a08e6c08..1cd9d20cca16 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c
@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@ mwifiex_reinit_sw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
adapter->workqueue =
alloc_workqueue("MWIFIEX_WORK_QUEUE",
- WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+ WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
if (!adapter->workqueue)
goto err_kmalloc;
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ mwifiex_reinit_sw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
adapter->rx_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("MWIFIEX_RX_WORK_QUEUE",
WQ_HIGHPRI |
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM |
- WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+ WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
if (!adapter->rx_workqueue)
goto err_kmalloc;
INIT_WORK(&adapter->rx_work, mwifiex_rx_work_queue);
@@ -1702,7 +1702,7 @@ mwifiex_add_card(void *card, struct completion *fw_done,
adapter->workqueue =
alloc_workqueue("MWIFIEX_WORK_QUEUE",
- WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+ WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
if (!adapter->workqueue)
goto err_kmalloc;
@@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ mwifiex_add_card(void *card, struct completion *fw_done,
adapter->rx_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("MWIFIEX_RX_WORK_QUEUE",
WQ_HIGHPRI |
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM |
- WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+ WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
if (!adapter->rx_workqueue)
goto err_kmalloc;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists