[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFootxdd/1o8P9Zd@lothringen>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 13:04:23 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
syzbot+5c54bd3eb218bb595aa9@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 06/20] posix-timers: Annotate concurrent access to
k_itimer::it_signal
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> k_itimer::it_signal is read lockless in the RCU protected hash lookup, but
> it can be written concurrently in the timer_create() and timer_delete()
> path. Annotate these places with READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists