[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtD1W6vJQBsNKEt_4tn2EeAs=73CeH4LoCwENrh2JUDwnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 15:31:16 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
"Ravi V . Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Check whether active load balance is
needed in busiest group
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 18:11, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> In the busiest group, we need to consider whether active load balance
> to a local group is needed even when it is not overloaded. For example,
> when the busiest group is a SMT group that's fully busy and the destination group
> is a cluster group with idle CPU. Such condition is considered by
> asym_active_balance() in load balancing but not when looking for busiest
> group and load imbalance. Add this consideration in find_busiest_group()
> and calculate_imbalance().
>
> Reviewed-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Could you have a look at what we did with misfit ?
we already have a SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY when busiest->group_type ==
group_misfit_task. Misfit_task is between overloaded and ahs_spare to
handle such situation. Please detect this during the update of
statistic and tag the group correctly. We will not re-start to add
exception everywhere.
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 87317634fab2..bde962aa160a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9433,6 +9433,17 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
> sgs->group_capacity;
> }
>
> +/* One group is SMT while the other group is not */
> +static inline bool asymmetric_groups(struct sched_group *sg1,
> + struct sched_group *sg2)
> +{
> + if (!sg1 || !sg2)
> + return false;
> +
> + return (sg1->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) !=
> + (sg2->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * update_sd_pick_busiest - return 1 on busiest group
> * @env: The load balancing environment.
> @@ -10079,6 +10090,31 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
> update_idle_cpu_scan(env, sum_util);
> }
>
> +static inline bool asym_active_balance_busiest(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Don't balance to a group without spare capacity.
> + *
> + * Skip non asymmetric sched group balancing. That check
> + * is handled by code path handling imbalanced load between
> + * similar groups.
> + */
> + if (env->idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE ||
> + sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare ||
> + !asymmetric_groups(sds->local, sds->busiest))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * For SMT source group, pull when there are two or more
> + * tasks over-utilizing a core.
> + */
> + if (sds->busiest->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY &&
> + sds->busiest_stat.sum_h_nr_running > 1)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * calculate_imbalance - Calculate the amount of imbalance present within the
> * groups of a given sched_domain during load balance.
> @@ -10164,6 +10200,12 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
> return;
> }
>
> + if (asym_active_balance_busiest(env, sds)) {
> + env->migration_type = migrate_task;
> + env->imbalance = 1;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (busiest->group_weight == 1 || sds->prefer_sibling) {
> unsigned int nr_diff = busiest->sum_nr_running;
> /*
> @@ -10371,6 +10413,9 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
> */
> goto out_balanced;
>
> + if (asym_active_balance_busiest(env, &sds))
> + goto force_balance;
> +
> if (busiest->group_weight > 1 &&
> local->idle_cpus <= (busiest->idle_cpus + 1))
> /*
> --
> 2.32.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists