[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcfae203-005f-928b-37d6-7ee5bb4e2971@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 07:04:06 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>, Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@...iatek.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"peter.wang@...iatek.com" <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
"chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com>,
"alice.chao@...iatek.com" <alice.chao@...iatek.com>,
"powen.kao@...iatek.com" <powen.kao@...iatek.com>,
"naomi.chu@...iatek.com" <naomi.chu@...iatek.com>,
"wsd_upstream@...iatek.com" <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ufs: don't use the fair tag sharings
On 5/9/23 01:03, Avri Altman wrote:
> However, I think the decision of that should be of the platform owner,
> And not in the core driver.
Hi Avri,
I don't see any use case in which performance of a UFS device would be improved
by leaving QUEUE_FLAG_FAIR_TAG_SHARING enabled. Are you perhaps aware of such a
use case?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists