| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 10:24:32 +0800
From: Wang Honghui <honghui.wang@...s.com.cn>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] locking: Fix a typo of comment
As title
Signed-off-by: Wang Honghui <honghui.wang@...s.com.cn>
---
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index d973fe6041bf..fe7335fb63d4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
* checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
* disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
* crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the
- * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
+ * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
* period
*/
barrier();
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
/*
* We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
- * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
+ * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct
* structure won't go away during the spinning period.
*/
owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists