[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vlq7hqrweo527daqh7m5iidcvlhujxsc3hwmeqm2oen4dbucsa@3yo2lm3d6aap>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 19:14:21 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc: "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v3 10/12] nvme/rc: Calculate IO size for random
fio jobs
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 11:31:10PM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> - _xfs_run_fio_verify_io /dev/"${nvmedev}n1" "1m" || echo FAIL
> > + rand_io_size="$(_nvme_calc_rand_io_size 4M)"
> > + _run_fio_rand_io --filename="/dev/${nvmedev}n1" --size="${rand_io_size}"
>
> Here, _xfs_run_fio_verify_io is replaced with _run_fio_rand_io. May I confirm
> that this replacement does not affect this test case? Same question for the hunk
> below.
This is on purpose. The test just wants only verify that IO is still working.
Because _xfs_run_fio_verify_io has the minimum requirement of 350M for
nvme_img_size. When I wrote the test I didn't know this and thus this change.
I'll update the commit message to include this info.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists