linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] workqueue: support holding a mutex for each work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 May 2023 08:34:09 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] workqueue: support holding a mutex for each work

On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 06:04:26PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> @@ -2387,7 +2389,13 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
>  	 */
>  	lockdep_invariant_state(true);
>  	trace_workqueue_execute_start(work);
> -	worker->current_func(work);
> +	if (unlikely(pwq->wq->work_mutex)) {
> +		mutex_lock(pwq->wq->work_mutex);
> +		worker->current_func(work);
> +		mutex_unlock(pwq->wq->work_mutex);
> +	} else {
> +		worker->current_func(work);
> +	}

Ah, I don't know about this. This can't be that difficult to do from the
callee side, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun