[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230510-salad-decaf-009b9da48271-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 09:21:16 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
Cc: Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Schuyler Patton <spatton@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] can: m_can: Add hrtimer to generate software
interrupt
On 09.05.2023 17:18:06, Judith Mendez wrote:
[...]
> >> + if (!mcan_class->polling && irq < 0) {
> >> + ret = -ENXIO;
> >> + dev_err_probe(mcan_class->dev, ret, "IRQ int0 not found and polling not activated\n");
> >> + goto probe_fail;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (mcan_class->polling) {
> >> + if (irq > 0) {
> >> + mcan_class->polling = 0;
> >
> > false
> >
> >> + dev_dbg(mcan_class->dev, "Polling enabled and hardware IRQ found, use hardware IRQ\n");
> >
> > "...using hardware IRQ"
> >
> > Use dev_info(), as there is something not 100% correct with the DT.
>
> Is it dev_info or dev_dbg?
dev_info() - But without an explicit "poll-interval' in the DT, this
code path doesn't exist anymore.
> I used to have dev_info since it was nice to see when polling was
> enabled.
Re-read your code, this is not about enabling polling. This message
handles the case where an IRQ was given _and_ "poll-interval" was
specified. So there is something not 100% correct with the DT (IRQ _and_
polling), but this is obsolete now.
> Also, I had seen this print and the next as informative prints, hence the dev_info().
We don't print messages when IRQs are enabled, so enabling polling
should be a dev_dbg(), too.
> However, I was told in this review process to change to dev_dbg. Which is correct?
Driver works correct -> dev_dbg()
Something is strange -> dev_info()
Hope that helps,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists