linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 13/21] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers separately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230510072817.116056-14-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2023 09:28:09 +0200
From:   Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 13/21] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers separately

For the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at expiry time
model it's required to have separate expiry times for the pinned and the
non-pinned (movable) timers. Therefore struct timer_events is introduced.

No functional change

Originally-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <richardcochran@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 010c8877fa85..e4b50760da3f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -221,6 +221,11 @@ struct timer_base {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct timer_base, timer_bases[NR_BASES]);
 
+struct timer_events {
+	u64	local;
+	u64	global;
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(timers_nohz_active);
@@ -1997,17 +2002,17 @@ static void forward_base_clk(struct timer_base *base, unsigned long nextevt,
  */
 u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
 {
+	struct timer_events tevt = { .local = KTIME_MAX, .global = KTIME_MAX };
 	unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
 	struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
 	bool local_first, is_idle;
-	u64 expires = KTIME_MAX;
 
 	/*
 	 * Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline.
 	 * Possible pending timers will be migrated later to an active cpu.
 	 */
 	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
-		return expires;
+		return tevt.local;
 
 	base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
 	base_global = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]);
@@ -2052,16 +2057,46 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
 	/* We need to mark both bases in sync */
 	base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;
 
-	if (base_local->timers_pending || base_global->timers_pending) {
+	/*
+	 * If the bases are not marked idle, i.e one of the events is at
+	 * max. one tick away, then the CPU can't go into a NOHZ idle
+	 * sleep. Use the earlier event of both and store it in the local
+	 * expiry value. The next global event is irrelevant in this case
+	 * and can be left as KTIME_MAX. CPU will wakeup on time.
+	 */
+	if (!is_idle) {
 		/* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
 		if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
 			nextevt = basej;
-		expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+		tevt.local = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If the bases are marked idle, i.e. the next event on both the
+	 * local and the global queue are farther away than a tick,
+	 * evaluate both bases. No need to check whether one of the bases
+	 * has an already expired timer as this is caught by the !is_idle
+	 * condition above.
+	 */
+	if (base_local->timers_pending)
+		tevt.local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the local queue expires first, then the global event can be
+	 * ignored. The CPU wakes up before that. If the global queue is
+	 * empty, nothing to do either.
+	 */
+	if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending)
+		tevt.global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
 	raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);
 
-	return cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, expires);
+	tevt.local = min_t(u64, tevt.local, tevt.global);
+
+	return cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, tevt.local);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.30.2