lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2023 20:29:44 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@....com>, Le Ma <le.ma@....com>,
        Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@....com>,
        YiPeng Chai <YiPeng.Chai@....com>,
        "Jiadong.Zhu" <Jiadong.Zhu@....com>,
        Yang Wang <KevinYang.Wang@....com>,
        Candice Li <candice.li@....com>,
        Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
        Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@....com>,
        Linux AMDGPU <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "Azamat S. Kalimoulline" <turtle@...on.ru>,
        max <kernel-ODwfxu5zp4@...xor.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Kernel 5.11 crashes when it boots, it produces black screen.

On 5/10/23 16:51, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Bagas, thx for all your help with regression tracking, much appreciated
> (side note, as I'm curious for a while already: what is your motivation?
> Just want to help? But whatever, any help is great!).
> 

I did this when I was on "gabut" (an Indonesian slang term that means
doing nothing but get rewarded). In other words, I was finding a task
when there is no documentation review or issues that needs to be worked
on.

> That being said: I'm not sure if I like what you did in this particular
> case, as developers might start getting annoyed by regression tracking
> if we throw too many bug reports of lesser quality before their feet --
> and then they might start to ignore us, which we really need to prevent.
> 
> That's why I would not have forwarded that report at this point of time,
> mainly for these reasons:
> 
>  * The initial report is quite old already, as it fall through the
> cracks (not good, but happens; sorry Azamat!). Hence in this case it
> would definitely be better to *first* ask the reporter to check if the
> problem still happens with latest mainline (or at least latest stable)
> before involving the kernel developers, as it might have been fixed
> already.
> 

Oh dear, I have already seen the bug age (two years old, from Reported
date).

>  * This might not be a amdgpu bug at all; in fact the other bug the
> reporter mentioned was an iommu thing. Hence this might be one of those
> regressions where a bisection is the only way to get down to the
> problem. Sure, sending a few developers a quick inquiry along the lines
> of "do you maybe have an idea what's up there" is fine, but that's not
> what you did in your mail. Your list of recipients is also quite long;
> that's risky: if you do that too often, as then they might start
> ignoring mail from you.
> 

Oops, I was blindly copy-paste get_maintainer.pl list at that time.

Anyway, thanks for the reminder!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ