[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230511200142.GC2296992@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 22:01:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, akiyks@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH locking/atomic 18/19] locking/atomic: Refrain from
generating duplicate fallback kernel-doc
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:53:46PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Do you have an alternative suggestion for generating the kernel-doc?
> The current lack of it is problematic.
I've never found a lack of kernel-doc to be a problem. And I'm very much
against complicating the scripts to add it.
Also, there's Documentation/atomic_t.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists