| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAG9=OMOMrFcy6UdL8-3wZGwOr1nqLm1bpvL+G1g2dvBhJWU2Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:03:23 -0700
From: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@...omium.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 9:58 AM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 06 2023 at 2:29P -0400,
> Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > dm-thinpool uses the provision request to provision
> > blocks for a dm-thin device. dm-thinpool currently does not
> > pass through REQ_OP_PROVISION to underlying devices.
> >
> > For shared blocks, provision requests will break sharing and copy the
> > contents of the entire block. Additionally, if 'skip_block_zeroing'
> > is not set, dm-thin will opt to zero out the entire range as a part
> > of provisioning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > index 2b13c949bd72..3f94f53ac956 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ struct pool {
> >
> > process_bio_fn process_bio;
> > process_bio_fn process_discard;
> > + process_bio_fn process_provision;
> >
> > process_cell_fn process_cell;
> > process_cell_fn process_discard_cell;
> > @@ -913,7 +914,8 @@ static void __inc_remap_and_issue_cell(void *context,
> > struct bio *bio;
> >
> > while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&cell->bios))) {
> > - if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> > + if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> > + bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION)
> > bio_list_add(&info->defer_bios, bio);
> > else {
> > inc_all_io_entry(info->tc->pool, bio);
> > @@ -1245,8 +1247,8 @@ static int io_overlaps_block(struct pool *pool, struct bio *bio)
> >
> > static int io_overwrites_block(struct pool *pool, struct bio *bio)
> > {
> > - return (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) &&
> > - io_overlaps_block(pool, bio);
> > + return (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) && io_overlaps_block(pool, bio) &&
> > + bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_PROVISION;
> > }
> >
> > static void save_and_set_endio(struct bio *bio, bio_end_io_t **save,
> > @@ -1953,6 +1955,51 @@ static void provision_block(struct thin_c *tc, struct bio *bio, dm_block_t block
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void process_provision_bio(struct thin_c *tc, struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > + int r;
> > + struct pool *pool = tc->pool;
> > + dm_block_t block = get_bio_block(tc, bio);
> > + struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell;
> > + struct dm_cell_key key;
> > + struct dm_thin_lookup_result lookup_result;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If cell is already occupied, then the block is already
> > + * being provisioned so we have nothing further to do here.
> > + */
> > + build_virtual_key(tc->td, block, &key);
> > + if (bio_detain(pool, &key, bio, &cell))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (tc->requeue_mode) {
> > + cell_requeue(pool, cell);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + r = dm_thin_find_block(tc->td, block, 1, &lookup_result);
> > + switch (r) {
> > + case 0:
> > + if (lookup_result.shared) {
> > + process_shared_bio(tc, bio, block, &lookup_result, cell);
> > + } else {
> > + bio_endio(bio);
> > + cell_defer_no_holder(tc, cell);
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + case -ENODATA:
> > + provision_block(tc, bio, block, cell);
> > + break;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + DMERR_LIMIT("%s: dm_thin_find_block() failed: error = %d",
> > + __func__, r);
> > + cell_defer_no_holder(tc, cell);
> > + bio_io_error(bio);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void process_cell(struct thin_c *tc, struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell)
> > {
> > int r;
> > @@ -2228,6 +2275,8 @@ static void process_thin_deferred_bios(struct thin_c *tc)
> >
> > if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> > pool->process_discard(tc, bio);
> > + else if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION)
> > + pool->process_provision(tc, bio);
> > else
> > pool->process_bio(tc, bio);
> >
> > @@ -2579,6 +2628,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> > dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd);
> > pool->process_bio = process_bio_fail;
> > pool->process_discard = process_bio_fail;
> > + pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> > pool->process_cell = process_cell_fail;
> > pool->process_discard_cell = process_cell_fail;
> > pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping_fail;
> > @@ -2592,6 +2642,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> > dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd);
> > pool->process_bio = process_bio_read_only;
> > pool->process_discard = process_bio_success;
> > + pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> > pool->process_cell = process_cell_read_only;
> > pool->process_discard_cell = process_cell_success;
> > pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping_fail;
> > @@ -2612,6 +2663,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> > pool->out_of_data_space = true;
> > pool->process_bio = process_bio_read_only;
> > pool->process_discard = process_discard_bio;
> > + pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> > pool->process_cell = process_cell_read_only;
> > pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping;
> > set_discard_callbacks(pool);
> > @@ -2628,6 +2680,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> > dm_pool_metadata_read_write(pool->pmd);
> > pool->process_bio = process_bio;
> > pool->process_discard = process_discard_bio;
> > + pool->process_provision = process_provision_bio;
> > pool->process_cell = process_cell;
> > pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping;
> > set_discard_callbacks(pool);
> > @@ -2749,7 +2802,8 @@ static int thin_bio_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
> > return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> > }
> >
> > - if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) {
> > + if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> > + bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION) {
> > thin_defer_bio_with_throttle(tc, bio);
> > return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> > }
> > @@ -3396,6 +3450,9 @@ static int pool_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
> > pt->adjusted_pf = pt->requested_pf = pf;
> > ti->num_flush_bios = 1;
> > ti->limit_swap_bios = true;
> > + ti->num_provision_bios = 1;
> > + ti->provision_supported = true;
> > + ti->max_provision_granularity = true;
> >
> > /*
> > * Only need to enable discards if the pool should pass
> > @@ -4114,6 +4171,8 @@ static void pool_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
> > * The pool uses the same discard limits as the underlying data
> > * device. DM core has already set this up.
> > */
> > +
> > + limits->max_provision_sectors = pool->sectors_per_block;
> > }
> >
> > static struct target_type pool_target = {
> > @@ -4288,6 +4347,9 @@ static int thin_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
> > ti->max_discard_granularity = true;
> > }
> >
> > + ti->num_provision_bios = 1;
> > + ti->provision_supported = true;
> > +
>
> We need this in thin_ctr: ti->max_provision_granularity = true;
>
> More needed in the thin target than thin-pool; otherwise provision bio
> issued to thin devices won't be split appropriately. But I do think
> its fine to set in both thin_ctr and pool_ctr.
>
> Otherwise, looks good.
>
Thanks! I'll add it to the next iteration (in addition to any other
feedback that's added to v6).
Given that this series covers multiple subsystems, would there be a
preferred way of queueing this for merge?
Best
Sarthak
> Thanks,
> Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists