[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f6c0fc4-abfa-4e73-7cff-ce04239bb54c@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:38:14 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] x86/resctrl: Call mon_event_count() directly for
soft RMIDs
Hi Peter,
On 4/21/2023 7:17 AM, Peter Newman wrote:
> There is no point in using IPIs to call mon_event_count() when it is
> only reading software counters from memory.
>
> When RMIDs are soft, mon_event_read() just calls mon_event_count()
> directly.
>From this patch forward the patch ordering is a bit confusing.
At this time mon_event_count() does not read software counters
from memory so I think this change should move to later.
Also, note that rdt_mon_soft_rmid is introduced here but
the reader is left wondering how it is set until the final patch
in this series.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists