linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: omap: Convert omap.txt to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230511232812.067440cf@akair>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2023 23:28:12 +0200
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        tony@...mide.com, afd@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: omap: Convert omap.txt to yaml

Am Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:32:49 +0200
schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>:

> On 05/04/2023 18:19, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> > 
> > Convert omap.txt to yaml.
> >   
> 
> 
> > +      - description: TI AM43 SoC based platforms
> > +        items:
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - compulab,am437x-cm-t43
> > +              - ti,am437x-gp-evm
> > +              - ti,am437x-idk-evm
> > +              - ti,am437x-sk-evm
> > +          - pattern: '^ti,am4372[26789]$'
> > +          - const: ti,am43
> > +
> > +      - description: TI AM57 SoC based platforms
> > +        items:
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - beagle,am5729-beagleboneai
> > +              - compulab,cl-som-am57x
> > +              - ti,am5718-idk
> > +              - ti,am5728-idk
> > +              - ti,am5748-idk
> > +          - pattern: '^ti,am57[0124][689]$'  
> 
> I don't think my comments were resolved. I asked if it is possible to
> make a board called "ti,am5718-idk" with "ti,am5749" or with
> "ti,am5708"?
> 
I am preparing a reduced version of this without all that pattern
matches where I do not know the intention the original author had. 

> What's more, you dropped several variations and compatibles against
> original binding (all the "dra") and it is not explained in commit msg
> at all.
>
ok, time to better compare it by scrips, Did not notice
the dra stuff  with am* in the other compatibles.