lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168378486157.333092.4222573391811617519.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2023 15:01:01 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi <quic_vnivarth@...cinc.com>
Cc:     quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com, mka@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
        quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com, quic_ptalari@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Select FIFO mode for chip select

On Tue, 09 May 2023 15:31:36 +0530, Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi wrote:
> Spi geni driver switches between FIFO and DMA modes based on xfer length.
> FIFO mode relies on M_CMD_DONE_EN interrupt for completion while DMA mode
> relies on XX_DMA_DONE.
> During dynamic switching, if FIFO mode is chosen, FIFO related interrupts
> are enabled and DMA related interrupts are disabled. And viceversa.
> Chip select shares M_CMD_DONE_EN interrupt with FIFO to check completion.
> Now, if a chip select operation is preceded by a DMA xfer, M_CMD_DONE_EN
> interrupt would have been disabled and hence it will never receive one
> resulting in timeout.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Select FIFO mode for chip select
      commit: 4c329f5da7cfa366bacfda1328a025dd38951317

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ