[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fVmFRxD1=3pX5yG_T=a=_pnU-OtXbNLnwMmTxjHv2itgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 17:05:09 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf build: Add system include paths to BPF builds
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:35 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Fri, May 05, 2023 at 07:14:50PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > There are insufficient headers in tools/include to satisfy building
> > BPF programs and their header dependencies. Add the system include
> > paths from the non-BPF clang compile so that these headers can be
> > found.
> >
> > This code was taken from:
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> > index 61c33d100b2b..37befdfa8ac8 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> > +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> > @@ -1057,7 +1057,25 @@ $(SKEL_TMP_OUT) $(LIBAPI_OUTPUT) $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT) $(LIBPERF_OUTPUT) $(LIBSUBCMD_
> >
> > ifndef NO_BPF_SKEL
>
> So this patch was done before the reverts, I adjusted it to what is
> upstream and to another patch that makes the build use the headers from
> the perf sources instead of the system's (linux/bpf.h and
> linux/perf_event.h, from vmlinux.h), please take a look at the patch
> below, I'm also trying to figure out that other problem you pointed with
> linux/types.s :-\
>
> What I have now in tmp.perf-tools:
>
> ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools]$ git log --oneline torvalds/master..
> a2af0f6b8ef7ea40 (HEAD -> perf-tools) perf build: Add system include paths to BPF builds
> 5be6cecda0802f23 perf bpf skels: Make vmlinux.h use bpf.h and perf_event.h in source directory
> 7d161165d9072dcb perf parse-events: Do not break up AUX event group
> a468085011ea8bba perf test test_intel_pt.sh: Test sample mode with event with PMU name
> 123361659fa405de perf evsel: Modify group pmu name for software events
> 34e82891d995ab89 tools arch x86: Sync the msr-index.h copy with the kernel sources
> 705049ca4f5b7b00 tools headers kvm: Sync uapi/{asm/linux} kvm.h headers with the kernel sources
> 8d6a41c8065e1120 tools include UAPI: Sync the sound/asound.h copy with the kernel sources
> 92b8e61e88351091 tools headers UAPI: Sync the linux/const.h with the kernel headers
> e7ec3a249c38a9c9 tools headers UAPI: Sync the i915_drm.h with the kernel sources
> e6232180e524e112 tools headers UAPI: Sync the drm/drm.h with the kernel sources
> 5d1ac59ff7445e51 tools headers UAPI: Sync the linux/in.h with the kernel sources
> b0618f38e2ab8ce3 perf build: Gracefully fail the build if BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1 is specified and clang isn't available
> 5f0b89e632ed81b6 perf test java symbol: Remove needless debuginfod queries
> 327daf34554d20a6 perf parse-events: Don't reorder ungrouped events by PMU
> ccc66c6092802d68 perf metric: JSON flag to not group events if gathering a metric group
> 1b114824106ca468 perf stat: Introduce skippable evsels
> 2a939c8695035b11 perf metric: Change divide by zero and !support events behavior
> ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools]$
>
> Please help me test this,
build-test and compiling with/without BPF skeletons looked okay in
perf test on my Debian derived distro.
Thanks,
Ian
> Regards,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists