[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28629bcd-d01a-92ab-b27c-0b8ae8bfdaf3@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 16:54:23 +0800
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "abelvesa@...nel.org" <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: imx93: introduce clk_bypassed module parameter
On 5/10/2023 5:13 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 07:49:20AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: imx93: introduce clk_bypassed module
>>> parameter
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>>>
>>>> With the clk names specified in clk_bypassed module parameter, give
>>>> user an option to bypass the clk from managing them by Linux kernel.
>>>
>>> As I said on another email, no, please do not add new module parameters
>>> for drivers, this is not the 1990s
>>
>> After a search of the list,
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=module_param
>>
>> I still see many drivers are adding module_param.
>
> And they should not be doing so as it is almost always not a good idea
> (note, some subsystems, like sound, do require it, as that's the api
> they use, so this is not a blanket statement.)
>
>> Is this is strict ban that new platform driver should not add
>> module_param?
>
> You need to really really really justify, and document in the changelog
> text, why all of the other methods of configuring a platform driver will
> not work in order to have it considered.
I just wanna use the module parateter to give user a choice to choose
to bypass some clocks. There are 100+ clocks in the driver. Different
user may wanna different configuration. With device tree, it is
not flexible.Such as user A may wanna bypass clock X, Y; user B may
wanna bypass clock Z.
With module parameter, I could easily set it in bootargs.
But anyway if this is not preferred, I need to find other way.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists