[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e58646d7ae4cad32ae30e2e7b54806cc1272d63.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 11:03:01 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/jcore-aic: Fix missing allocation of IRQ
descriptors
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 09:47 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 08:22:20 +0100,
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jason!
>
> ???
Sorry, I was confused by this:
> > > [- Jason]
> > >
> > > It really begs the question: how has it ever been working before?
> >
> > Users already used a locally patched kernel to work around this problem.
>
> You're not answering my question. Does it mean JCore never worked
> upstream?
It did still work which is why the previously suggested change was to make a
failing call to irq_alloc_descs() non-fatal. The boards still booted up.
> > > Is there any plan to modernise the port and get it to allocate
> > > irq_descs on demand, as we do on most architectures?
> >
> > Yes, there are plans to modernize the port. We're first working on
> > upstreaming all kinds of patches that have been queuing up over the
> > time.
>
> I'd rather you skip that step and focus on making it work as a modern
> architecture. This really looks like ARM circa 2007... :-/
We have a patch-set for switching it to device tree in the pipeline.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists