lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <121e4796-6150-4bc7-fc6b-3dc292966687@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2023 09:30:30 +0800
From:   Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robert.hu@...ux.intel.com" <robert.hu@...ux.intel.com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize()



On 5/10/2023 8:41 PM, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 14:06 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>> Define a 32-bit parameter and consolidate the two bools into it.
> Technically, per C standard I don't think you can "define" a parameter of a
> function, but can only "declare".
>
>> __linearize() has two bool parameters write and fetch. And new flag
>> will be needed to support new feature (e.g. LAM needs a flag to skip
>> address untag under some conditions).
> Since this is the first patch to mention LAM in this series, it would be better
> to use the full name Intel Linear Address Masking (LAM).
>    
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> In the follow-up patches, the new parameter will be extended for LAM.
> A duplicated sentence to me.  Perhaps you can just remove it.
>
> Some changelog material FYI:
>
> 	Consolidate two bool parameters (write/fetch) of __linearize() into a
> 	'u32 flag' parameter to make the function be more concise and future
> 	extendable, i.e. to support Intel Linear Address Masking (LAM), which
> 	allows high non-address bits of linear address to be used as metadata.
>
> 	Define two flags to replace the two bools.  A new flag will be added to
> 	to support LAM to skip masking off metadata bits of linear address
> under
> 	some conditions.
>
> 	No functional change intended.
Thanks, will update it.

>
>> Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
> Anyway:
>
> Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ