lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de498202-846d-2997-6226-94d302d846b2@loongson.cn>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2023 09:32:38 +0800
From:   Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
        Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LoongArch: Add jump-label implementation

Hi, Peter

On 05/10/2023 05:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:16:46PM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
>> Add jump-label implementation based on the ARM64 version.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/jump_label.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2f9fdec256c5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/jump_label.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Loongson Technology Corporation Limited
>> + *
>> + * Based on arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h
>> + */
>> +#ifndef __ASM_JUMP_LABEL_H
>> +#define __ASM_JUMP_LABEL_H
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> +
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +#define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE	4
>> +
>> +static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key * const key,
>> +					       const bool branch)
>> +{
>> +	asm_volatile_goto(
>> +		"1:	nop					\n\t"
>> +		 "	.pushsection	__jump_table, \"aw\"	\n\t"
>> +		 "	.align		3			\n\t"
>> +		 "	.long		1b - ., %l[l_yes] - .	\n\t"
>> +		 "	.quad		%0 - .			\n\t"
>> +		 "	.popsection				\n\t"
>> +		 :  :  "i"(&((char *)key)[branch]) :  : l_yes);
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +l_yes:
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key * const key,
>> +						    const bool branch)
>> +{
>> +	asm_volatile_goto(
>> +		"1:	b		%l[l_yes]		\n\t"
>> +		 "	.pushsection	__jump_table, \"aw\"	\n\t"
>> +		 "	.align		3			\n\t"
>> +		 "	.long		1b - ., %l[l_yes] - .	\n\t"
>> +		 "	.quad		%0 - .			\n\t"
>> +		 "	.popsection				\n\t"
>> +		 :  :  "i"(&((char *)key)[branch]) :  : l_yes);
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +l_yes:
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>
> Seems simple enough; one change I did a while ago for the x86 version is
> to put the __jump_table entry generation in a macro so it could be
> shared between the (3 for x86) variants.

Looks better, I will define JUMP_TABLE_ENTRY macro so that
arch_static_branch and arch_static_branch_jump can share.

Thanks,
Youling.

>
> Not saying you have to do that, just saying it's an option.
>
>> +#endif  /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>> +#endif	/* __ASM_JUMP_LABEL_H */
>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/jump_label.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b06245955f7a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/jump_label.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Loongson Technology Corporation Limited
>> + *
>> + * Based on arch/arm64/kernel/jump_label.c
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <asm/inst.h>
>> +
>> +void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
>> +			       enum jump_label_type type)
>> +{
>> +	void *addr = (void *)jump_entry_code(entry);
>> +	u32 insn;
>> +
>> +	if (type == JUMP_LABEL_JMP)
>> +		insn = larch_insn_gen_b(jump_entry_code(entry), jump_entry_target(entry));
>> +	else
>> +		insn = larch_insn_gen_nop();
>> +
>> +	larch_insn_patch_text(addr, insn);
>> +}
>
> This all implies Loongarch is fine with the nop<->b transition (much
> like arm64 is), but I found no actual mention of what transitions are
> valid for the architecture in your inst.c file -- perhaps you could put
> a small comment there to elucidate the occasional reader that doesn't
> have your arch manual memorized?
>
>
> Anyway, as with most RISC implementations it's short and sweet.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ