[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFzncPmqH1C5HAyf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 15:02:40 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 1/1] net: fec: using the standard return codes
when xdp xmit errors
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:24:52AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 05/10/2023 15:05, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> >
> > This patch standardizes the inconsistent return values for unsuccessful
> > XDP transmits by using standardized error codes (-EBUSY or -ENOMEM).
>
> Shouldn't this patch target net-next instead of net? As Simon suggested
> here [1], or maybe is just me who misunderstood that part.
> Also it is nice to CC people who comment at your previous patches in all
> the next versions.
>
> Just a small thing, if there is only 1 patch in the series, you don't
> need to add 1/1 in the subject.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230509193845.1090040-1-shenwei.wang@nxp.com/T/#m4b6b21c75512391496294fc78db2fbdf687f1381
>
> >
> > Fixes: 26312c685ae0 ("net: fec: correct the counting of XDP sent frames")
Hi Shenwei,
I agree with Horatiu.
Also, this is not a fix. So it should not have a Fixes tag.
After waiting for further review please send a v3 with these updates.
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists