[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230511132113.80196-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:21:09 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, damon@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/5] mm: vmalloc must set pte via arch code
It is bad practice to directly set pte entries within a pte table.
Instead all modifications must go through arch-provided helpers such as
set_pte_at() to give the arch code visibility and allow it to validate
(and potentially modify) the operation.
Fixes: 3e9a9e256b1e ("mm: add a vmap_pfn function")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 9683573f1225..d8d2fe797c55 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2899,10 +2899,13 @@ struct vmap_pfn_data {
static int vmap_pfn_apply(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, void *private)
{
struct vmap_pfn_data *data = private;
+ pte_t ptent;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn_valid(data->pfns[data->idx])))
return -EINVAL;
- *pte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(data->pfns[data->idx++], data->prot));
+
+ ptent = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(data->pfns[data->idx++], data->prot));
+ set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, pte, ptent);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists