[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7c5f4334ab6ff897547c68ea216fbcba22d4929.camel@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 15:23:14 +0200
From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Let scsi_execute_cmd() mark args->sshdr as invalid
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 15:17 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >
> > We know for certain that sizeof(*sshdr) is 8 bytes, and will most
> > probably remain so. Thus
> >
> > memset(sshdr, 0, sizeof(*sshdr))
> >
> > would result in more efficient code.
>
> I fail to see why zeroing a single byte would be less efficient than
> zeroing
> a possibly unaligned 8-byte area.
I don't think it can be unaligned. gcc seems to think the same. It
compiles the memset(sshdr, ...) in scsi_normalize_sense() into a single
instruction on x86_64.
0xffffffff8177e9d0 <scsi_normalize_sense>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) [FTRACE NOP]
0xffffffff8177e9d5 <scsi_normalize_sense+5>: test %rdi,%rdi
0xffffffff8177e9d8 <scsi_normalize_sense+8>: movq $0x0,(%rdx)
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists