lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7c5f4334ab6ff897547c68ea216fbcba22d4929.camel@suse.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2023 15:23:14 +0200
From:   Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Let scsi_execute_cmd() mark args->sshdr as invalid

On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 15:17 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > 
> > We know for certain that sizeof(*sshdr) is 8 bytes, and will most
> > probably remain so. Thus
> > 
> >      memset(sshdr, 0, sizeof(*sshdr))
> > 
> > would result in more efficient code.
> 
> I fail to see why zeroing a single byte would be less efficient than
> zeroing
> a possibly unaligned 8-byte area.

I don't think it can be unaligned. gcc seems to think the same. It
compiles the memset(sshdr, ...) in scsi_normalize_sense() into a single
instruction on x86_64.

0xffffffff8177e9d0 <scsi_normalize_sense>:      nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1) [FTRACE NOP]
0xffffffff8177e9d5 <scsi_normalize_sense+5>:    test   %rdi,%rdi
0xffffffff8177e9d8 <scsi_normalize_sense+8>:    movq   $0x0,(%rdx)

Martin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ