[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZF0RxoLRyl78s8sf@bart.dudau.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 17:03:18 +0100
From: Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: dts: ralink: Add support for TP-Link HC220 G5 v1
board.
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 9.05.2023 22:01, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > This WiFi AP is based on a MT7621 SoC with 128MiB RAM, 128MiB NAND,
> > a MT7603 2.4GHz WiFi and a MT7663 5GHz WiFi chips integrated on the board,
> > connected to the main SoC over PCIe.
> >
> > The GMAC1 on the SoC is connected to PHY0 on the GSW and can be used to
> > improve routing bandwidth.
> >
> > The device uses NMBM over NAND, which is not currently supported in the
> > mainline, so NAND node is skipped in this revision.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>
>
> This is great to see. I'm going to mainline all the MT7621 devicetrees on
> OpenWrt at some point, this is a good step for this.
AFAIK this board is not supported by OpenWrt at all. So the flow will be
the other way this time :)
>
> > ---
> > arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/Makefile | 3 +-
> > .../dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220_g5.dts | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220_g5.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/Makefile b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/Makefile
> > index 11732b8c8163a..c57a2b40876b4 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/Makefile
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_DTB_VOCORE2) += vocore2.dtb
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_MT7621) += \
> > mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc1.dtb \
> > - mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc2.dtb
> > + mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc2.dtb \
> > + mt7621-tplink-hc220_g5.dtb
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB) += $(addsuffix .o, $(dtb-y))
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220_g5.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220_g5.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..83d15711907d0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220_g5.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "mt7621.dtsi"
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + compatible = "tplink,hc220-g5", "mediatek,mt7621-soc";
>
> tplink,hc220-g5-v1 should fit better. Also please make another patch to add
> the compatible string under Boards with Mediatek/Ralink MT7621 SoC on
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/ralink.yaml.
Will do another patch with the documentation update. I will also send a v2
incorporating all your review comments, thanks for taking the time!
Regarding the full name: I'm quite tempted to drop the v1(.0) entirely as I'm
not really sure that TP-Link will release another board. Doing a search now
I fail to find on any TP-Link results the mention of the version.
>
> > + model = "TP-Link HC220 G5 v1.0";
>
> "TP-Link HC220 G5 v1" should be enough.
>
> > +
> > + memory@0 {
> > + device_type = "memory";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x8000000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + chosen {
> > + /* bootargs = "earlycon=uart8260,mmio32,0x1e000c00 root=/dev/ram0 kgdboc=ttyS0,115200 ip=192.168.88.1:192.168.88.2:::hc220:eth1:none kgdbcon console=ttyS0,115200"; */
> > + /* bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200 earlycon=uart8260,mmio32,0x1e000c00 root=/dev/ram0"; */
> > + bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200 root=/dev/nfs ip=192.168.88.2:192.168.88.5::255.255.255.0:hc220_g5:eth1:none nfsroot=192.168.88.5:/mips,vers=4,sec=sys ro rootwait";
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio-keys {
> > + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> > +
> > + key-reset {
> > + label = "reset";
> > + gpios = <&gpio 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + linux,code = <KEY_RESTART>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + key-wps {
> > + label = "wps";
> > + gpios = <&gpio 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + linux,code = <KEY_WPS_BUTTON>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + leds {
> > + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> > +
> > + red {
> > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
> > + function = LED_FUNCTION_FAULT;
> > + gpios = <&gpio 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + green {
> > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
> > + function = LED_FUNCTION_POWER;
> > + gpios = <&gpio 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + linux,default-trigger = "default-on";
> > + };
> > +
> > + blue {
> > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
> > + function = LED_FUNCTION_WPS;
> > + gpios = <&gpio 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + resetc: reset-controller {
> > + compatible = "ralink,rt2880-reset";
> > + #reset-cells = <1>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + mtd {
> > + compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-nfc";
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&i2c {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&pcie {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&spi0 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + flash@0 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* gmac1 connected to MT7530's phy0 */
> > +&gmac1 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > + phy-handle = <ðphy0>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&mdio {
> > + /* MT7530's phy0 */
> > + ethphy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + phy-mode = "rgmii";
> > + };
> > +};
>
> These are partially wrong, check the mt7621.dtsi on mainline. Or better,
> don't do it. I'm very close to adding support for changing the DSA conduit
> for user ports. I suggest you just add port@0 to the DSA switch node below.
>
I don't claim to be an expert on DSA or how MT7530 connects to MT7621, however
I do remember trying various combinations and failing to make all the ports
work. I blame TP-Link on having a weird setup, but to be sure I will try your
suggestion if I manage to understand exactly where I'm "partially wrong" :)
I will also try to remove the node to see what I get and report back here.
Best regards,
Liviu
> > +
> > +&switch0 {
> > + /* #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-controller; */
> > +
> > + ports {
> > + /* phy0 is muxed to gmac1 */
> > + /delete-node/ port@0;
> > +
> > + port@1 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > + label = "lan1";
> > + };
> > +
> > + port@2 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > + label = "wan";
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
>
> Arınç
--
Everyone who uses computers frequently has had, from time to time,
a mad desire to attack the precocious abacus with an axe.
-- John D. Clark, Ignition!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists