[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ehnawbpypxg5vppwcoiuswlq5c54td5mos4jldf5tuy7wbjlvb@o7fydrxd2y34>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 00:07:59 +0800
From: Ruihan Li <lrh2000@....edu.cn>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ruihan Li <lrh2000@....edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: page_table_check: Make it dependent on !DEVMEM
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 06:40:31PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 10.05.23 10:55, Ruihan Li wrote:
> > The special device /dev/mem enables users to map arbitrary physical
> > memory regions into the user space, which can conflict with the double
> > mapping detection logic used by the page table check. For instance,
> > pages may change their properties (e.g., from anonymous pages to named
> > pages) while they are still being mapped in the user space via /dev/mem,
> > leading to "corruption" detected by the page table check.
> >
> > To address this issue, the PAGE_TABLE_CHECK config option is now
> > dependent on !DEVMM. This ensures that the page table check cannot be
> > enabled when /dev/mem is used. It should be noted that /dev/mem itself
> > is a significant security issue, and its conflict with a hardening
> > technique is understandable.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.17
> > Signed-off-by: Ruihan Li <lrh2000@....edu.cn>
> > ---
> > Documentation/mm/page_table_check.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > mm/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/page_table_check.rst b/Documentation/mm/page_table_check.rst
> > index cfd8f4117..b04f29230 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/mm/page_table_check.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/mm/page_table_check.rst
> > @@ -52,3 +52,21 @@ Build kernel with:
> > Optionally, build kernel with PAGE_TABLE_CHECK_ENFORCED in order to have page
> > table support without extra kernel parameter.
> > +
> > +Implementation notes
> > +====================
> > +
> > +We specifically decided not to use VMA information in order to avoid relying on
> > +MM states (except for limited "struct page" info). The page table check is a
> > +separate from Linux-MM state machine that verifies that the user accessible
> > +pages are not falsely shared.
> > +
> > +As a result, special devices that violate the model cannot live with
> > +PAGE_TABLE_CHECK. Currently, /dev/mem is the only known example. Given it
> > +allows users to map arbitrary physical memory regions into the userspace, any
> > +pages may change their properties (e.g., from anonymous pages to named pages)
> > +while they are still being mapped in the userspace via /dev/mem, leading to
> > +"corruption" detected by the page table check. Therefore, the PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
> > +config option is now dependent on !DEVMEM. It's worth noting that /dev/mem
> > +itself is a significant security issue, and its conflict with a hardening
> > +technique is understandable.
> > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig.debug b/mm/Kconfig.debug
> > index a925415b4..37f3d5b20 100644
> > --- a/mm/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/mm/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ config PAGE_OWNER
> > config PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
> > bool "Check for invalid mappings in user page tables"
> > - depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
> > + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK && !DEVMEM
> > select PAGE_EXTENSION
> > help
> > Check that anonymous page is not being mapped twice with read write
>
> That might disable it in a lot of environments I'm afraid. I wonder if we
> could allow it for STRICT_DEVMEM. Hm ...
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
That sounds pretty reasonable. However, I'm not quite sure if PageAnon
makes sense of (and is guaranteed to work well with) I/O memory pages,
which should be the only pages allowed to be accessed via /dev/mem under
STRICT_DEVMEM.
A quick test has shown that PageAnon (by accident or design?) results in
"false" for I/O memory pages. Meanwhile, the logic used in the page
table check allows named (i.e., non-anonymous) pages to be shared
arbitrarily (i.e. in both read-only and read-write modes) between
processes. So it looks that everything works fine. But is it a
coincidence?
Thanks,
Ruihan Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists